š
Original date posted:2014-04-17
š Original message:Not necessarily. Running a private server involves listening to the p2p
network for incoming transactions, performing validation on receipt and
organizing a mempool, performing transaction selection, and relaying
blocks to auditors - none of which is tested in a reindex.
A reindex would give you an optimistic upper bound though, if that's all
you care about.
On 04/17/2014 08:49 AM, Mike Hearn wrote:
> 2) If I wanted to measure validation performance, to get the number of
> peak tps that could be processed without taking block sides or network
> latency into account, how would I do that? Has anybody tried this
> before?
>
> You can just reindex/replay the chain. It's been done many times.
Mark Friedenbach [ARCHIVE] /
npub1r3ā¦48d0u
2023-06-07 15:18:50
in reply to nevent1qā¦f6zu
Author Public Key
npub1r3san9v5njl6798hvauyu9ntm6r9c7u8s0t65wls58gpfdcvqp5sa48d0uPublished at
2023-06-07 15:18:50Event JSON
{
"id": "3cebd85be11b03dc2e3cd09490c87baf98b850ddfbb41184b9b5f8feb9b7633c",
"pubkey": "1c61d995949cbfaf14f767784e166bde865c7b8783d7aa3bf0a1d014b70c0069",
"created_at": 1686151130,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"67963d1e5aaadedf8554f040e8adfd218b263901ac293984048ad998b27336ea",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"fe8b37e7e865f23895b7baa7e988f77c198aae09ae387454be83b71f3dd2dc4a",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"498a711971f8a0194289aee037a4c481a99e731b5151724064973cc0e0b27c84"
]
],
"content": "š
Original date posted:2014-04-17\nš Original message:Not necessarily. Running a private server involves listening to the p2p\nnetwork for incoming transactions, performing validation on receipt and\norganizing a mempool, performing transaction selection, and relaying\nblocks to auditors - none of which is tested in a reindex.\n\nA reindex would give you an optimistic upper bound though, if that's all\nyou care about.\n\nOn 04/17/2014 08:49 AM, Mike Hearn wrote:\n\u003e 2) If I wanted to measure validation performance, to get the number of\n\u003e peak tps that could be processed without taking block sides or network\n\u003e latency into account, how would I do that? Has anybody tried this\n\u003e before?\n\u003e \n\u003e You can just reindex/replay the chain. It's been done many times.",
"sig": "f8058736ee4fd566f31de20c5a3e7d27858980f67f7f71120ef5d762644b9908c1067d51469e92b52ab40bb2e1ef4d48856149a2cf98a137a578b18f8baeb3f5"
}