📅 Original date posted:2019-01-04
📝 Original message:
On Fri, 4 Jan 2019 at 04:43, ZmnSCPxj <ZmnSCPxj at protonmail.com> wrote:
> > - in set reconciliation schemes: we could reconcile [channel id |
> > timestamp | checksum] first
>
> Perhaps I misunderstand how set reconciliation works, but --- if timestamp is changed while checksum is not, then it would still be seen as a set difference and still require further communication rounds to discover that the channel parameters have not actually changed.
>
> Perhaps it is better to reconcile [channel_id | checksum] instead, and if there is a different set of channel parameters, share the set difference and sort out which timestamp is later at that point.
Ah yes of course, the `timestamp` should not be included.
Cheers,
Fabrice
Fabrice Drouin [ARCHIVE] /
npub1s8…5yaw4
2023-06-09 12:53:51
in reply to nevent1q…vtrj
Author Public Key
npub1s8zghfrvyydu3ld5jrgue7crvzw8agyslpv8mh9pexgxwmcfelfsk5yaw4Published at
2023-06-09 12:53:51Event JSON
{
"id": "36ac1dd9884dc55707393ea3a4f440e0eb882c225977c168dad52fba292f0d96",
"pubkey": "81c48ba46c211bc8fdb490d1ccfb03609c7ea090f8587ddca1c990676f09cfd3",
"created_at": 1686315231,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"fd0da5dbd5383b525edc98216d5094b180c1b831bf7af1f8df8ca35294a8c8fd",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"19d602c0e3be7535b74842de8d0db5ff784698a8e3e54d74a486a91140e304fd",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"4505072744a9d3e490af9262bfe38e6ee5338a77177b565b6b37730b63a7b861"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2019-01-04\n📝 Original message:\nOn Fri, 4 Jan 2019 at 04:43, ZmnSCPxj \u003cZmnSCPxj at protonmail.com\u003e wrote:\n\u003e \u003e - in set reconciliation schemes: we could reconcile [channel id |\n\u003e \u003e timestamp | checksum] first\n\u003e\n\u003e Perhaps I misunderstand how set reconciliation works, but --- if timestamp is changed while checksum is not, then it would still be seen as a set difference and still require further communication rounds to discover that the channel parameters have not actually changed.\n\u003e\n\u003e Perhaps it is better to reconcile [channel_id | checksum] instead, and if there is a different set of channel parameters, share the set difference and sort out which timestamp is later at that point.\n\nAh yes of course, the `timestamp` should not be included.\n\nCheers,\nFabrice",
"sig": "358edbacd6fa748c2cf2113388ef32f02c4c1b161051819424ace1834f7b57b6536d3cfecc911662fc94520a98304ba9c44f300cac29b0a514c2c67a399fc635"
}