Bert on Nostr: Literally has nothing to do with hallucinations but okay. If you’re talking about ...
Literally has nothing to do with hallucinations but okay. If you’re talking about the resurrection, with all due respect, your lack of knowledge on “hallucinations” is very apparent. Even atheist/agnostic researcher would agree impossible that it was a hallucination given the number of eye witnesses involved.
If you have any real interest in exploring, and asking for an honest starting point: There is a book called the Case for Christ. Written by an atheist to disprove Christianity. Lead to complete opposite conclusion. Proof of work, if you will. Maybe start there and see if maybe your own research is missing something.
Published at
2024-07-09 22:07:14Event JSON
{
"id": "36b756f882b47095661f152663ba536493a43672f85d95d47dfe65645d71b00b",
"pubkey": "ea0c49062a0343e2d581478619acd658664a883c650a6ce6915a7fc0b0328401",
"created_at": 1720562834,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"6a1f6efbf5303d40cc7fc803d5a5180be190378f61a58ac363998dfdede6cd2f",
"wss://relay.primal.net",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"c3cf035f93fcddbf076557aca6f9ccadf8232694f779992a26bca5b58dcb2c55",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"45f195cffcb8c9724efc248f0507a2fb65b579dfabe7cd35398598163cab7627"
]
],
"content": "Literally has nothing to do with hallucinations but okay. If you’re talking about the resurrection, with all due respect, your lack of knowledge on “hallucinations” is very apparent. Even atheist/agnostic researcher would agree impossible that it was a hallucination given the number of eye witnesses involved.\n\nIf you have any real interest in exploring, and asking for an honest starting point: There is a book called the Case for Christ. Written by an atheist to disprove Christianity. Lead to complete opposite conclusion. Proof of work, if you will. Maybe start there and see if maybe your own research is missing something.",
"sig": "e5fc2367d0d56c71149fbd8a59cf6ae8fbd89b7e36607031a47f87efd1c0301398f6b11c3f0856f391fab2b1d9e7d8cc7deb3827fc4a587fe9283ccdef1361ba"
}