đ
Original date posted:2015-08-09
đ Original message:I'm glad Tom is bringing these points up. There seems to be an assumption
by many that LN will be automatically awesome by virtue of it being
technically feasible with having considered whether it is economically
feasible or desirable.
So much stock has been placed in LN as the solution to the block size
debate, yet it could turn out that it sucks in practice. Then what?
On Aug 9, 2015 5:27 PM, "Tom Harding via bitcoin-dev" <
bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> On Aug 9, 2015 11:54 AM, "Mark Friedenbach" <mark at friedenbach.org> wrote:
>
> > On the contrary the funds were advanced by the hub on the creation of
> the channel. There is no credit involved.
>
> That's a chuckle.
>
> As I said, nothing requires the hub to advance anything, and if it does,
> Bob can expect to pay for it.
>
> We'll see whether hubs assess a fee for depositing funds, whether the fee
> depends on the amount deposited, and whether it depends on the amount of
> time it stays there.
>
> I predict "all of the above." There is a name for these kinds of fees.
> Can you guess it?
>
> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150809/db8043fc/attachment.html>;
Chris Pacia [ARCHIVE] /
npub1jpâŚkn8jw
2023-06-07 17:33:05
in reply to nevent1qâŚn5jw
Author Public Key
npub1jp0jnnq2jxcjy76nrt5dssvmpynt4f9psdelp3vxj0y0xtpxl7jqhkn8jwPublished at
2023-06-07 17:33:05Event JSON
{
"id": "3c30c8aa0416b5d1e06fa280fc640a8bed426a6fda78b97b1cfc371029b26860",
"pubkey": "905f29cc0a91b1227b531ae8d8419b0926baa4a18373f0c58693c8f32c26ffa4",
"created_at": 1686159185,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"c33253e971194f2c7907c001b126807e52ef4e506229e6eaa41e873f7674b436",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"67100cf931849cd90bdcee3380018b76e4ca0b4f6221073ba85bf041788409b8",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"dc329a02c970aabf03b87185ef51c86afe4586fe3a148508af898af3fabc56a3"
]
],
"content": "đ
Original date posted:2015-08-09\nđ Original message:I'm glad Tom is bringing these points up. There seems to be an assumption\nby many that LN will be automatically awesome by virtue of it being\ntechnically feasible with having considered whether it is economically\nfeasible or desirable.\n\nSo much stock has been placed in LN as the solution to the block size\ndebate, yet it could turn out that it sucks in practice. Then what?\nOn Aug 9, 2015 5:27 PM, \"Tom Harding via bitcoin-dev\" \u003c\nbitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\u003e wrote:\n\n\u003e On Aug 9, 2015 11:54 AM, \"Mark Friedenbach\" \u003cmark at friedenbach.org\u003e wrote:\n\u003e\n\u003e \u003e On the contrary the funds were advanced by the hub on the creation of\n\u003e the channel. There is no credit involved.\n\u003e\n\u003e That's a chuckle.\n\u003e\n\u003e As I said, nothing requires the hub to advance anything, and if it does,\n\u003e Bob can expect to pay for it.\n\u003e\n\u003e We'll see whether hubs assess a fee for depositing funds, whether the fee\n\u003e depends on the amount deposited, and whether it depends on the amount of\n\u003e time it stays there.\n\u003e\n\u003e I predict \"all of the above.\" There is a name for these kinds of fees.\n\u003e Can you guess it?\n\u003e\n\u003e _______________________________________________\n\u003e bitcoin-dev mailing list\n\u003e bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\n\u003e https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev\n\u003e\n\u003e\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150809/db8043fc/attachment.html\u003e",
"sig": "e45653e31363bf57b2e91171fcaba3a1637b41699ba9f2b32fa754ed57e24cd8468eba95e63ad02e236e4899de24aaaf3f93f212e8282a788a85a3e807513a99"
}