npub1phq5f2hapyx5kv75rntea6pftlcyxanvzjcc7hh8fe86xysm7xvskf2jmm (npub1phq…2jmm)
The ruling didn't rely on the supposed false testimony of Smith, it was based on "Gubmint cannot coerce speech."
Retrying on that ground isn't going to work.
But it was judicial activism. Again, not unconstitutional.
Staid Winnow /
npub16j…xxaac
2023-07-04 22:35:57
in reply to nevent1q…lcn9
Author Public Key
npub16jg7lhpjxv4muq3c5ayr30q265mz4ukzqcugq700nvaszgavjuhq2xxaacPublished at
2023-07-04 22:35:57Event JSON
{
"id": "3e8674ec506bdd1c262923634e0e1e1665c1e1a90f5507e68b8147452a946031",
"pubkey": "d491efdc32332bbe0238a74838bc0ad5362af2c206388079ef9b3b0123ac972e",
"created_at": 1688510157,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"p",
"0dc144aafd090d4b33d41cd79ee8295ff043766c14b18f5ee74e4fa3121bf199",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"p",
"3f59b5c878411d8ef6a2bd9d4c4c690c030820c0ec185101cc963fa7b3043475",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"e",
"4b75745044fb79f6e820c57e5fc3452ff884c480ca1e23d37611cb7671b2ba52",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub",
"reply"
],
[
"content-warning",
"Article explaining why SCOTUS wedding website case is unlikely to be overturned. Sharing to inform, not because I want the ruling upheld or want people to stop protesting the decision. Please don't shoot the messenger."
],
[
"mostr",
"https://mastodon.social/users/staidwinnow/statuses/110658201658501430"
]
],
"content": "nostr:npub1phq5f2hapyx5kv75rntea6pftlcyxanvzjcc7hh8fe86xysm7xvskf2jmm \n\nThe ruling didn't rely on the supposed false testimony of Smith, it was based on \"Gubmint cannot coerce speech.\"\n\nRetrying on that ground isn't going to work.\n\nBut it was judicial activism. Again, not unconstitutional.",
"sig": "de5541a83b49ffc01433c4f778011d9f6d68d03fa7f1956b40b73fc5e486b23df7a7f0579647c9b226a5eeccd0315ffef0238508a4897610333bbd324ca96ac6"
}