Event JSON
{
"id": "33bbd264ba12866a6d9b63417831a4cda76ed60c019892ef196c9c83c091b607",
"pubkey": "8b8b41a605f70e16790473bd6064cc0fdd9bc1faf4903d8ecb0ed6b279718819",
"created_at": 1709533087,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"p",
"f84e8a47a373aef5a7cda786d8cac9c337396750642ae01a091876bc91459948",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"p",
"b659839c038b03f72862e0c78e4106dc80b75c6e9257c5e2690d2488ba14659a",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"emoji",
"blobcatcoffee",
"https://files.mastodon.social/custom_emojis/images/000/064/080/original/64eaacfe393b80d0.png"
],
[
"proxy",
"https://mastodon.social/users/gulovsen/statuses/112035960419058339",
"activitypub"
]
],
"content": "\"'CNET, usually regarded as an ordinary tech [reliable source], has started experimentally running AI-generated articles, which are riddled with errors,' a Wikipedia editor named David Gerard wrote to kick off a January 2023 discussion thread in Wikipedia's Reliable Sources forum, where editors convene to decide whether a given source is trustworthy enough for editors to cite.\"\n\nWait, THAT David Gerard? Yes, of course, THAT nostr:npub1lp8g53arwwh0tf7d57rd3jkfcvmnje6svs4wqxsfrpmtey29n9yqre4rrw.\n\n:blobcatcoffee: \n\nhttps://futurism.com/wikipedia-cnet-unreliable-ai",
"sig": "e57ef268bcb1241ee88db3724a5c937cc0c498e46f66354d21e5ad29da4963d1fcdd9ba5bdfd5514e03d94b600e4e27fdf744b03a7e08cbaf002262c70c5c001"
}