📅 Original date posted:2022-05-01
📝 Original message:Hello ZmnSCPxj,
This is an intended feature. I'm thinking that the same fidelity bond
can be used to running a JoinMarket maker as well as a Teleport
(Coinswap) maker.
I don't believe it's abusable. It would be a problem if the same
fidelity bond is used by two makers in the _same_ application, but
JoinMarket takers are already coded to check for this, and Teleport
takers will soon as well. Using the same bond across different
applications is fine.
Best,
CB
On 01/05/2022 10:43, ZmnSCPxj wrote:
> Good morning Chris,
>
> Excellent BIP!
>
>>From a quick read-over, it seems to me that the fidelity bond does not commit to any particular scheme or application.
> This means (as I understand it) that the same fidelity bond can be used to prove existence across multiple applications.
> I am uncertain whether this is potentially abusable or not.
>
>
> Regards,
> ZmnSCPxj
Chris Belcher [ARCHIVE] /
npub1ek…lnm2u
2023-06-07 23:08:45
in reply to nevent1q…47na
Author Public Key
npub1ekvnqhww3aagwuj9t55dgj5y29u8cxdjllfv3vgppt8vc0zljhrs6lnm2uPublished at
2023-06-07 23:08:45Event JSON
{
"id": "3f6430da526d074bd8404216c84791bb8325951a6b873629e3401a46f7691072",
"pubkey": "cd99305dce8f7a8772455d28d44a8451787c19b2ffd2c8b1010acecc3c5f95c7",
"created_at": 1686179325,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"ed87b4a661b1ec563ef35bba3e76c69fedd4dee29f9239e792212ae30f6447d4",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"f6792f892246f475e3f23276aff6f3e3c23e7b63b9bf9a9f9b8ba52b68cfc5e6",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"4505072744a9d3e490af9262bfe38e6ee5338a77177b565b6b37730b63a7b861"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2022-05-01\n📝 Original message:Hello ZmnSCPxj,\n\nThis is an intended feature. I'm thinking that the same fidelity bond \ncan be used to running a JoinMarket maker as well as a Teleport \n(Coinswap) maker.\n\nI don't believe it's abusable. It would be a problem if the same \nfidelity bond is used by two makers in the _same_ application, but \nJoinMarket takers are already coded to check for this, and Teleport \ntakers will soon as well. Using the same bond across different \napplications is fine.\n\nBest,\nCB\n\nOn 01/05/2022 10:43, ZmnSCPxj wrote:\n\u003e Good morning Chris,\n\u003e \n\u003e Excellent BIP!\n\u003e \n\u003e\u003eFrom a quick read-over, it seems to me that the fidelity bond does not commit to any particular scheme or application.\n\u003e This means (as I understand it) that the same fidelity bond can be used to prove existence across multiple applications.\n\u003e I am uncertain whether this is potentially abusable or not.\n\u003e \n\u003e \n\u003e Regards,\n\u003e ZmnSCPxj",
"sig": "cd0eb7ca06fd9582e6523bd7c453fd2fa4ae9babbca6ff25ca5e5991eaeff380e38edfe350f4bb82eef2c84c46debb05db66b35db3dacd0422d4b386ed2a6df0"
}