📅 Original date posted:2015-06-22
📝 Original message:On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 8:32 PM, Jean-Paul Kogelman <jeanpaulkogelman at me.com
> wrote:
>
> Since it's possible that block timestamps aren't chronological in order,
> what would happen if a block following a size increase trigger is back in
> the past before the size increase? Would that block have a lower size
> restriction again? Would using block height not be a more stable number to
> work with?
>
The activation or not rule is purely timestamp based. Blocks with a
timestamp less than 1452470400 have a limit of 1MB. There could be an 8MB
block followed by a block that is limited to 1MB.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150622/2fbf6432/attachment.html>;
Tier Nolan [ARCHIVE] /
npub1g6…sl5wd
2023-06-07 15:39:53
in reply to nevent1q…p7fr
Author Public Key
npub1g6vxlp4e0nyhs2dqxxcryztyf5f5hyuaq93nw4r87zcnv0sdsa0qqsl5wdSeen on
wss://relay.noswhere.comPublished at
2023-06-07 15:39:53Event JSON
{
"id": "3f62514e66f990e981df511d115c40e239e1b8c018ac166b2276cd26b6764709",
"pubkey": "46986f86b97cc97829a031b03209644d134b939d0163375467f0b1363e0d875e",
"created_at": 1686152393,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"1936c15d372dc9e8a0eaf645dcff207375e90675dbebfadcf82370abc654737d",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"e2a9112c428b44afc8ec4a54c3f17038339a78bc3f237108caee27b38fbb30ed",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"874fa44d110b2119208ba6fb27607799f16a00c82143201ad7f179a89f0df349"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2015-06-22\n📝 Original message:On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 8:32 PM, Jean-Paul Kogelman \u003cjeanpaulkogelman at me.com\n\u003e wrote:\n\n\u003e\n\u003e Since it's possible that block timestamps aren't chronological in order,\n\u003e what would happen if a block following a size increase trigger is back in\n\u003e the past before the size increase? Would that block have a lower size\n\u003e restriction again? Would using block height not be a more stable number to\n\u003e work with?\n\u003e\n\nThe activation or not rule is purely timestamp based. Blocks with a\ntimestamp less than 1452470400 have a limit of 1MB. There could be an 8MB\nblock followed by a block that is limited to 1MB.\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150622/2fbf6432/attachment.html\u003e",
"sig": "b381c9a5bbcaeb0f55a05f8ebb39cd25b02efb9a115b8157951162452d3dc6e795cd3c7438cf1db41515d9f97d43ee870f291f724bc56d9177d6ce4ed21b5416"
}