š
Original date posted:2015-07-24
š Original message:On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 03:39:08PM +0200, Thomas Zander via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> On Friday 24. July 2015 05.37.30 Slurms MacKenzie via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> > It's worth noting that even massive companies with $30M USD of funding don't
> > run a single Bitcoin Core node,
>
> I assume you mean that they don't have a Bitcoin Core node that is open to
> incoming connections. Since that is the only thing you can actually test, no?
We can test the fact that blockchain.info's wallet and block explorer
has behaved in a way consistent with not running a full node - they have
shown invalid data that any full node would reject on multiple
occasions, most recently invalid confirmations during the BIP66 fork.
--
'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org
000000000000000006baf20e289b563e3ec69320275086169a47e9c58d4abfba
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 650 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150724/9fa29c09/attachment.sig>;
Peter Todd [ARCHIVE] /
npub1m2ā¦a2np2
2023-06-07 15:43:35
in reply to nevent1qā¦dqy8
Author Public Key
npub1m230cem2yh3mtdzkg32qhj73uytgkyg5ylxsu083n3tpjnajxx4qqa2np2Published at
2023-06-07 15:43:35Event JSON
{
"id": "3f52e6ec01491fa20c732ec48071aa11f430256925101c1e41795ecfffd09399",
"pubkey": "daa2fc676a25e3b5b45644540bcbd1e1168b111427cd0e3cf19c56194fb231aa",
"created_at": 1686152615,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"fad7a9dfe8ad03505fa882cfc142cd53cfb83fa310033743eaad5169b0befe94",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"c2aa0c1768268491cc61abb8f89775a7d8260dfa7cf377978258e06443af4854",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"6f226bd1c86c22aed12ec82cd2dab4b5e2f77fd662ac4e1f881170a12da87bd6"
]
],
"content": "š
Original date posted:2015-07-24\nš Original message:On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 03:39:08PM +0200, Thomas Zander via bitcoin-dev wrote:\n\u003e On Friday 24. July 2015 05.37.30 Slurms MacKenzie via bitcoin-dev wrote:\n\u003e \u003e It's worth noting that even massive companies with $30M USD of funding don't\n\u003e \u003e run a single Bitcoin Core node,\n\u003e \n\u003e I assume you mean that they don't have a Bitcoin Core node that is open to \n\u003e incoming connections. Since that is the only thing you can actually test, no?\n\nWe can test the fact that blockchain.info's wallet and block explorer\nhas behaved in a way consistent with not running a full node - they have\nshown invalid data that any full node would reject on multiple\noccasions, most recently invalid confirmations during the BIP66 fork.\n\n-- \n'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org\n000000000000000006baf20e289b563e3ec69320275086169a47e9c58d4abfba\n-------------- next part --------------\nA non-text attachment was scrubbed...\nName: signature.asc\nType: application/pgp-signature\nSize: 650 bytes\nDesc: Digital signature\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150724/9fa29c09/attachment.sig\u003e",
"sig": "4f89eb2dd9705895b2dfadc7b757cd5d21198499067a1b463f72959280ba6d78dba3cf5fc3a3e6b070d631e8a24ed92022b17c69dfb7f094ac349354ee75281b"
}