Perlover on Nostr: There’s another subtle point to consider. He returned to the forum a year and a ...

There’s another subtle point to consider. He returned to the forum a year and a half later and wrote that he was a Bitcoin user, offering the forum readers proof by saying, "Look, I have a message here." At that time, he only had two posts. The first was about buying an invitation to a social network for $2. The second was the Bitcoin transaction post, which HBO uses as their main argument. Now, what do you think he meant when he called himself a Bitcoin user and invited people to check? He clearly wasn’t referring to that first message about buying an invitation for $2—that has nothing to do with being a Bitcoin user. Most likely, he was pointing to the post where he discusses how changing the transaction fee affects inputs and outputs. And if we assume he was Satoshi Nakamoto, then how foolish would it be to come back to the forum under his real name, Peter Todd, and mention that he had posted about Bitcoin as Satoshi Nakamoto? It’s simply absurd!