Event JSON
{
"id": "3d636c85ec7e719ce4cd48f3abcdac3cf2481bd55a1cf43e3f02228d8c5d582d",
"pubkey": "9916b532e910693cc359ba41a202d0ac15961f032a73648255eb182ffe4d118b",
"created_at": 1694653768,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"p",
"394b5c0e4e9fda3e59c4dd3e289153ee4f581eac53f6a1da685ca64452a5f8f4",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"p",
"8757127d57629a9a1b7c04bd443049db086850d1d33bc1964e6485992cde22af",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"e",
"90c6d7c574011e6e35536c51bfe8a84304b1de5de6d3ef732bda9f1731268372",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub",
"reply"
],
[
"proxy",
"https://noagendasocial.com/users/MaleticResearch/statuses/111060829387713632",
"activitypub"
]
],
"content": "nostr:npub18994crjwnldrukwym5lz3y2nae84s84v20m2rkngtjnyg549lr6qvxmd6m Shall not be infringed is opportunity to fight back, not automagicall hocus-pocus. Say, recent NM gun ban happened in Canada. They have Charter of Rights but it opens with right of Gvt to arbitrarily suspend any or all rights at it's own choice by declaring \"emergency\" hence, ban would stay no Court would stop it. In real NM case lawsuits were filed and 3 days later, not instantly, infringement was stopped. That is what Constitution provides, fighting chance (note, it requires fighting)",
"sig": "bceeba7f158eaf39ee482f31936c45e10bb1224a96b750f4c2a24fccf69a610bf140050eda9b2f957f9866f692afca3bc16beb86c70ac321b43d079a43532c0e"
}
