melvincarvalho on Nostr: The antizap is the opposite of a zap. A zap is an upvote with a payment. An antizap ...
The antizap is the opposite of a zap. A zap is an upvote with a payment. An antizap is a downvote with a payment.
Research by Fehr and Gachter has shown that zap-like rewards lead to increased cooperation. But only for a while, and then the free rider effect takes over, and cooperation goes down.
It turns out that what is needed is a form of punishment for bad content, to increase overall cooperation.
So an "antizap" is the logical counter balance to the zap.
Its a big problem where to route the payment in the event of an antizap, so that it cant be gamed. I think I figured this out. You route it to a process (or DVM -- data vending machine) that is neutral and just uses the money to pay for the storage, and for hosting (small non-zero amount). There can be many antizap machines, a market for them, in each country, with different profiles.
The higher the antizap value, the longer the downvote survives. It can also topped up or crowd funded. It will have a tamper-proof audit trail and track record, a transparent policy. Some will survive, others will not. The best antizap machines will emerge in an evolutionary environment.
Published at
2024-06-03 07:21:03Event JSON
{
"id": "3a13f37a4ba9ee739f0ff1bca160dabf6c7d272b48f81addd3dbff1c8d9e0325",
"pubkey": "de7ecd1e2976a6adb2ffa5f4db81a7d812c8bb6698aa00dcf1e76adb55efd645",
"created_at": 1717399263,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"imeta",
"url https://void.cat/d/R3HH8Hit7ZSNDEq9dSLb99.webp",
"dim 1024x1792",
"x 30b1aaac7d72b5a095ed2c3915edb7bfa484fff96360da88e29a01254279782f"
]
],
"content": "The antizap is the opposite of a zap. A zap is an upvote with a payment. An antizap is a downvote with a payment.\n\nResearch by Fehr and Gachter has shown that zap-like rewards lead to increased cooperation. But only for a while, and then the free rider effect takes over, and cooperation goes down. \n\nIt turns out that what is needed is a form of punishment for bad content, to increase overall cooperation.\n\nSo an \"antizap\" is the logical counter balance to the zap.\n\nIts a big problem where to route the payment in the event of an antizap, so that it cant be gamed. I think I figured this out. You route it to a process (or DVM -- data vending machine) that is neutral and just uses the money to pay for the storage, and for hosting (small non-zero amount). There can be many antizap machines, a market for them, in each country, with different profiles.\n\nThe higher the antizap value, the longer the downvote survives. It can also topped up or crowd funded. It will have a tamper-proof audit trail and track record, a transparent policy. Some will survive, others will not. The best antizap machines will emerge in an evolutionary environment.\n\nhttps://void.cat/d/R3HH8Hit7ZSNDEq9dSLb99.webp",
"sig": "cc886e24ad68d551293950e80cac517f5e8fc41ae3bcbca79ae90e290d057422e92e0390b7b90a5c58e1beedb6cb899c94c91cd0cd926d2833f5ffb02588cc07"
}