Am I right on this matter from what I just read linked below? #asknostr
Some noise in dev circles: Peter Todd wants to lift the cap on how much data can go into an OP_RETURN. Right now it’s limited by policy, not consensus, so removing it wouldn’t break Bitcoin, it’d just open the door for more creative use.
Ordinals wouldn’t care (they use Taproot). But Runes and other Bitcoin-native DeFi experiments? They could thrive with less hacky workarounds. More clean ways to embed metadata.
Big picture? Bitcoin becomes more programmable not just “ultrasound money.”
Should some of us Maxis be concerned?
https://t.co/dMcQ4g8RjV
ContraMundum / ⚡️Contra⚡️
npub14h…xjjzu
2025-04-29 23:22:54
Author Public Key
npub14hq5lgadtyy9dhvtszq46dnl0s0xwdddqr7e32rdqqhma8a4xhsspxjjzuPublished at
2025-04-29 23:22:54Event JSON
{
"id": "3a4d56bfdfe8add6a2e6e54cfc2ef762de654ddd8801979c3fc9cabdd2625db6",
"pubkey": "adc14fa3ad590856dd8b80815d367f7c1e6735ad00fd98a86d002fbe9fb535e1",
"created_at": 1745968974,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"t",
"#asknostr"
]
],
"content": "Am I right on this matter from what I just read linked below? #asknostr\n\nSome noise in dev circles: Peter Todd wants to lift the cap on how much data can go into an OP_RETURN. Right now it’s limited by policy, not consensus, so removing it wouldn’t break Bitcoin, it’d just open the door for more creative use.\n\nOrdinals wouldn’t care (they use Taproot). But Runes and other Bitcoin-native DeFi experiments? They could thrive with less hacky workarounds. More clean ways to embed metadata.\n\nBig picture? Bitcoin becomes more programmable not just “ultrasound money.” \n\nShould some of us Maxis be concerned? \n\nhttps://t.co/dMcQ4g8RjV\n\n",
"sig": "23d755e7bb48fc46626f96371be05435041b2308b9afafd9052da6846aee3ab366edb003a7f95f340e67c65a8a5972275e0c7895de9e0adfd97a8365c031eb9f"
}