📅 Original date posted:2015-10-05
📝 Original message:Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org>
writes:
> However I don't think we've done a good job showing why we need to
> implement this feature via nSequence.
It could be implemented in other ways, but nSequence is the neatest and
most straightforward I've seen.
- I'm not aware of any other (even vague) proposal for its use? Enlighten?
- BIP68 reserves much of it for future use already.
If we apply infinite caution we could never use nSequence, as there
might be a better use tommorrow.
Cheers,
Rusty.
Rusty Russell [ARCHIVE] /
npub1zw…hkhpx
2023-06-07 17:42:28
in reply to nevent1q…lrv8
Author Public Key
npub1zw7cc8z78v6s3grujfvcv3ckpvg6kr0w7nz9yzvwyglyg0qu5sjsqhkhpxPublished at
2023-06-07 17:42:28Event JSON
{
"id": "3a7b4ca2befdae7aa008ba7ce40068eb29b0fe2d97333f920f9781850e32cd08",
"pubkey": "13bd8c1c5e3b3508a07c92598647160b11ab0deef4c452098e223e443c1ca425",
"created_at": 1686159748,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"cd753793d8b3cbb49eaba9a2f4a53184f03e5acc23bc580b4ff40cab73993d1e",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"4a76c5afe32440634df53cc3010e4ed5421370689ef47acbbe4bfde5a36f981a",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"fdf31024ca0537ed828d895ddc8525f8af023f0dc935a8327a8a496d0d7a9f83"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2015-10-05\n📝 Original message:Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev \u003cbitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\u003e\nwrites:\n\u003e However I don't think we've done a good job showing why we need to\n\u003e implement this feature via nSequence.\n\nIt could be implemented in other ways, but nSequence is the neatest and\nmost straightforward I've seen.\n\n- I'm not aware of any other (even vague) proposal for its use? Enlighten?\n- BIP68 reserves much of it for future use already.\n\nIf we apply infinite caution we could never use nSequence, as there\nmight be a better use tommorrow.\n\nCheers,\nRusty.",
"sig": "24984008bc4856fc53e132328bd0e48fd680fb03257b26e71df0d9c09c5a44874aa81d83fa6f1845a0892c740b2fe9119fd14d943d01649bec9c42027b0c810d"
}