Many scientific studies have been discussed and reviewed during the lawsuit to make the case for or against the harm of water #fluoridation. A judge is supposed to be able to understand and interpret those as well as the testimonies of experts. If not, then the judge wouldn’t be competent on the matter. No scientific study constitutes objective evidence by itself because a study can be partial, bias or even fraudulent. You always need a mind to interpret the evidences presented by both parties. The role of a judge is to be as impartial as possible. Also, it’s not particularly the objectivity of the decision I was pointing to but rather the fact that fluoridation of water is now official recognized as harmful (scientific literature was pointing to these conclusions a long time ago).
#Health
LogicallyMinded
npub1s0…2rqf5
2024-09-26 05:36:06
in reply to nevent1q…m3qr
Author Public Key
npub1s0fs9dwztm2rukm42vh6df4a5gwykclf75tgyeuc75t0cs2eh8rsu2rqf5Published at
2024-09-26 05:36:06Event JSON
{
"id": "3ab0ab961ab7204cbca95d1a5c013175856b2075b5d79727614d6ff817446d6b",
"pubkey": "83d302b5c25ed43e5b75532fa6a6bda21c4b63e9f516826798f516fc4159b9c7",
"created_at": 1727328966,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"7aa6cbd0d9a0329aff635c872876a29110449636bd74954f692eef319382a70a",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"86e6a91579da5865b471b6911a4e23b0d72a10db4e885755c1bff755b495fb9f",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"65912a7ad17fd5cf3bacce9759f3bea3a44f9a3397340e559cf067945dc638bf"
],
[
"t",
"fluoridation"
],
[
"t",
"health"
]
],
"content": "Many scientific studies have been discussed and reviewed during the lawsuit to make the case for or against the harm of water #fluoridation. A judge is supposed to be able to understand and interpret those as well as the testimonies of experts. If not, then the judge wouldn’t be competent on the matter. No scientific study constitutes objective evidence by itself because a study can be partial, bias or even fraudulent. You always need a mind to interpret the evidences presented by both parties. The role of a judge is to be as impartial as possible. Also, it’s not particularly the objectivity of the decision I was pointing to but rather the fact that fluoridation of water is now official recognized as harmful (scientific literature was pointing to these conclusions a long time ago).\n\n#Health",
"sig": "b8f0fb411eea929c56ed79ea9508c938af6fa7f008167b2d5ce59b0725959a1ebf0dcb8bcfece2bb23fcb01e50be225affcbaa8c8a89a2d610f92271e0d3d0ae"
}