#SimpleX
At times I'm very in awe of developers and coders. But when it comes to some of the most obvious things... they can be aloof. Apparently the developer got specific feedback on the name and wouldn't budge. Why?!
I think the term is also a math concept...
And I did a deep dive on the developer and he's LEGIT extremely talented. Like top shelf.
But the name alone is so bad IMO it's a barrier for adoption. Branding is everything and the name needs to be, at worst, neutral.
SimpleText
CipherX
CodeX
CryptX
EncryptX
NCRPTx
EtcX...
Cipher Stories
npub103…w3uul
2023-07-14 03:05:52
Author Public Key
npub103tex2x0jq52g4yd2yt6lf8cgj8m2yx2jq3l2a4hhjg0cklxeelq7w3uulPublished at
2023-07-14 03:05:52Event JSON
{
"id": "389b2966b692beec1af5fd37aab2008b227a378d310ac2e65459263c003e2007",
"pubkey": "7c579328cf9028a4548d5117afa4f8448fb510ca9023f576b7bc90fc5be6ce7e",
"created_at": 1689303952,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"t",
"SimpleX"
],
[
"t",
"simplex"
]
],
"content": "#SimpleX\n\nAt times I'm very in awe of developers and coders. But when it comes to some of the most obvious things... they can be aloof. Apparently the developer got specific feedback on the name and wouldn't budge. Why?! \n\nI think the term is also a math concept...\n\nAnd I did a deep dive on the developer and he's LEGIT extremely talented. Like top shelf. \n\nBut the name alone is so bad IMO it's a barrier for adoption. Branding is everything and the name needs to be, at worst, neutral.\n\nSimpleText \nCipherX\nCodeX\nCryptX\nEncryptX\nNCRPTx\n\nEtcX...",
"sig": "d4a5aa470b6255d500cc65990efdffe7fcd93762c21eb8778e2699553ad06e65916c52da0d6d10da7f1d06d42be11fac2e10d77947f3b44ea17da18faeb09da7"
}