Why Nostr? What is Njump?
2023-06-07 23:18:53

Christopher Allen [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: ๐Ÿ“… Original date posted:2023-01-31 ๐Ÿ—’๏ธ Summary of this message: Which is better ...

๐Ÿ“… Original date posted:2023-01-31
๐Ÿ—’๏ธ Summary of this message: Which is better for placing 64 bytes into the Bitcoin blockchain: traditional OP_RETURN or spent taproot transaction? Debate on safety and uncensorability.
๐Ÿ“ Original message:All other things being equal, which is better if you need to place a
64-bytes into the Bitcoin blockchain? A traditional OP_RETURN or a spent
taproot transaction such as:

OP_FALSE
OP_IF
OP_PUSH my64bytes
OP_ENDIF

I know that the anti-OP_RETURN folk would say โ€œneither.โ€ But if there was
no other choice for a particular protocol, such as a timestamp or a
commitment, which is better? Or is there a safer place to put 64 bytes that
is more uncensorable but also does not clog UTXO space, only spent
transaction `-txindex` space?

My best guess was that the taproot method is better, but I suspect there
might be some who disagree. I'd love to hear all sides.

-- Christopher Allen
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20230131/cac8f8b3/attachment.html>;
Author Public Key
npub19g47w5ewcqlpd7n07wpkp5cvcu2gjwrse0vl47l0avwl9hu933xsqct5d0