Roy Badami [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2014-01-13 📝 Original message:rOn Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at ...
📅 Original date posted:2014-01-13
📝 Original message:rOn Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 08:57:33PM +0100, Mike Hearn wrote:
> >
> > On further reflection, I'm not sure I understand this use case of the
> > payment protocol. Since a PaymentRequest currently contains the
> > Outputs that specify the addresses to send to, reusing a
> > PaymentRequest like this without using stealth addresses implies
> > address reuse.
>
>
> Yes indeed ...... which is why we're talking about extending the protocol
> (in a future version! the first version isn't even out yet!).
Yes, sorry, I miscontrued the thread here and now see that your
message was exactly talking about using stealth addresses within the
payment protocol.
Sorry for the confusion.
roy
Published at
2023-06-07 15:11:51Event JSON
{
"id": "350f51e20eb9e03b8dcb0f0924b728faa8d8eae5a242dcb6e712291c1917cb73",
"pubkey": "58f160e0dbc661605704b190e36f5199f881c861e53763c7057e6bc0c13e6950",
"created_at": 1686150711,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"6b79d8c7bec3dc6952db91cc68d0510d9897c37dcf58a24d8e2f4288fe42525c",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"e0e400973869b3afe0c5b7a12d25f327e461a00a8f7c76caf35bbd2e203612f0",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"f2c95df3766562e3b96b79a0254881c59e8639f23987846961cf55412a77f6f2"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2014-01-13\n📝 Original message:rOn Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 08:57:33PM +0100, Mike Hearn wrote:\n\u003e \u003e\n\u003e \u003e On further reflection, I'm not sure I understand this use case of the\n\u003e \u003e payment protocol. Since a PaymentRequest currently contains the\n\u003e \u003e Outputs that specify the addresses to send to, reusing a\n\u003e \u003e PaymentRequest like this without using stealth addresses implies\n\u003e \u003e address reuse.\n\u003e \n\u003e \n\u003e Yes indeed ...... which is why we're talking about extending the protocol\n\u003e (in a future version! the first version isn't even out yet!).\n\nYes, sorry, I miscontrued the thread here and now see that your\nmessage was exactly talking about using stealth addresses within the\npayment protocol.\n\nSorry for the confusion.\n\nroy",
"sig": "d0de3b00211c269a1e8f213c5a052ad46c9911016a6529e343c1b6710289f085376bf8299bc93ea42de34cab280bb4c6b19a78b3c5a312e9327606747c427b79"
}