📅 Original date posted:2015-08-21
📝 Original message:Decision making is not the goal of this site, it is only a way to see
various pros and cons of various devs on various proposals in a single
place.
This is for the community to have a coherent view about what you are
talking about now spread into reddit/mailing/forums.
If you did not analyzed a proposal yet, you don't have to fill out your
opinion veto or approval.
It is only to show what you would you "approve" and what you would "veto",
after your analysis.
Then point out all the discussions in the opinion section that lead you to
your conclusion.
You can change edit your position as you progress into your analysis and as
new BIP get redacted.
I'm eager to include the new proposals.
On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 1:45 PM, Gregory Maxwell <gmaxwell at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 4:57 AM, Nicolas Dorier via bitcoin-dev
> <bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > I created a small website which show a chart of your approvals about
> various
> > BIPs (which you must fill by yourself with a signed pgp message)
> > For each BIP, you can fill if you approve or not, and give comments.
> (HTML
> > accepted, so you can link stuff you your posts)
> > It would help the community a lot, so I hope you will do it !
> > I'm open to add other important devs, big miners, or other proposal that
> I
> > missed.
>
>
> I think this is a bit well, sad, at the moment-- a basic principle in
> sound decision making is that one should try to withhold judgement
> until after the analysis and options are laid out to avoid prematurely
> laying down "battle lines" which then they're socially and politically
> committed to a particular answer.
>
>
> There are several other BIPs in the works right now that aren't out
> there yet, as well (as presumably) new insight from the workshop. It
> would be a shame if these things would be for naught because of being
> decided prematurely.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150821/82dc4ac7/attachment.html>;
Nicolas Dorier [ARCHIVE] /
npub1hu…9q4u3
2023-06-07 15:48:22
in reply to nevent1q…93e2
Author Public Key
npub1huz53hq26gu7nc0qhw3uj6tr9hk5q2ngpywduxep5zy4ay9unftsm9q4u3Published at
2023-06-07 15:48:22Event JSON
{
"id": "35263ea64b7f2ae3858da6ef0fe9003a5798dbc562bbdd13458b5c1076f3eaab",
"pubkey": "bf0548dc0ad239e9e1e0bba3c969632ded402a68091cde1b21a0895e90bc9a57",
"created_at": 1686152902,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"81612a52e56fa005f6bed2cd04b516c7f082f0037e6ded416072f80ed9714e09",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"fd833f386c5a34e85194e6c3ddcd6ce2db0e83e83ad9647a6ec77319558624f2",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"4aa6cf9aa5c8e98f401dac603c6a10207509b6a07317676e9d6615f3d7103d73"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2015-08-21\n📝 Original message:Decision making is not the goal of this site, it is only a way to see\nvarious pros and cons of various devs on various proposals in a single\nplace.\nThis is for the community to have a coherent view about what you are\ntalking about now spread into reddit/mailing/forums.\n\nIf you did not analyzed a proposal yet, you don't have to fill out your\nopinion veto or approval.\nIt is only to show what you would you \"approve\" and what you would \"veto\",\nafter your analysis.\nThen point out all the discussions in the opinion section that lead you to\nyour conclusion.\n\nYou can change edit your position as you progress into your analysis and as\nnew BIP get redacted.\nI'm eager to include the new proposals.\n\n\n\n\n\nOn Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 1:45 PM, Gregory Maxwell \u003cgmaxwell at gmail.com\u003e wrote:\n\n\u003e On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 4:57 AM, Nicolas Dorier via bitcoin-dev\n\u003e \u003cbitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\u003e wrote:\n\u003e \u003e I created a small website which show a chart of your approvals about\n\u003e various\n\u003e \u003e BIPs (which you must fill by yourself with a signed pgp message)\n\u003e \u003e For each BIP, you can fill if you approve or not, and give comments.\n\u003e (HTML\n\u003e \u003e accepted, so you can link stuff you your posts)\n\u003e \u003e It would help the community a lot, so I hope you will do it !\n\u003e \u003e I'm open to add other important devs, big miners, or other proposal that\n\u003e I\n\u003e \u003e missed.\n\u003e\n\u003e\n\u003e I think this is a bit well, sad, at the moment-- a basic principle in\n\u003e sound decision making is that one should try to withhold judgement\n\u003e until after the analysis and options are laid out to avoid prematurely\n\u003e laying down \"battle lines\" which then they're socially and politically\n\u003e committed to a particular answer.\n\u003e\n\u003e\n\u003e There are several other BIPs in the works right now that aren't out\n\u003e there yet, as well (as presumably) new insight from the workshop. It\n\u003e would be a shame if these things would be for naught because of being\n\u003e decided prematurely.\n\u003e\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150821/82dc4ac7/attachment.html\u003e",
"sig": "aaebfe466db14d6c0e875e6c9225c6511ba7698c6111c16b9363c6609bd62f712f19945173d99b17a77cede1c4706eb58ff5799c1a437aa3c40e3bfea135935c"
}