📅 Original date posted:2014-05-02
📝 Original message:It will also be important to chose the currency symbol for "bits" at the
same time. Lowercase stroke "b" I think is the obvious choice.
Unicode U+0180
Aaron
On Friday, May 2, 2014, Alan Reiner <etotheipi at gmail.com> wrote:
> I've been a strong supporter of the 1e-6 unit switch since the beginning
> and ready to do whatever I can with Armory to help ease that transition.
> I'm happy to prioritize a release that updates the Armory interface to make
> "bits" the default unit, when the time is right. I think it makes sense to
> get as many apps and services to upgrade nearly simultaneously.
>
> My plan is to have a popup on the first load of the new version that
> briefly introduces the change, and mentions that they can go back to the
> old way in the settings, but make them work to do it. For the transient
> period (6 months?) all input boxes will auto-update nearby labels with the
> converted-to-BTC value as they type, so that they don't have to do any math
> in their head. Similarly, all displayed BTC values will show both. But
> the 1e-6 unit will always be default or first unless they explicitly change
> it in the interface.
>
>
>
>
> On 5/2/2014 8:54 PM, Ben Davenport wrote:
>
> I fully support this (it's what I suggested over a year ago), but what it
> comes down to is BitPay, Coinbase, Blockchain and Bitstamp getting
> together, agreeing what they're going to use, and doing a little joint
> customer education campaign around it. If there's community momentum around
> "bits", great.
>
> My only addition is that I think we should all stop trying to attach SI
> prefixes to the currency unit. Name me another world currency that uses SI
> prefixes. No one quotes amounts as 63 k$ or 3 M$. The accepted standard at
> least in the US is <currency-symbol><amount><modifier>, i.e. $63k or $3M.
> That may not be accepted form everywhere, but in any case it's an informal
> format, not a formal one. The important point is there should be one base
> unit that is not modified with SI prefixes. And I think the arguments are
> strong for that unit being = 100 satoshi.
>
> Ben
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 12:17 PM, Jeff Garzik <jgarzik at bitpay.com<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','jgarzik at bitpay.com');>
> > wrote:
>
>> <vendor hat: on>
>>
>> Related:
>> http://blog.bitpay.com/2014/05/02/bitpay-bitcoin-and-where-to-put-that-decimal-point.html
>>
>> --
>> Jeff Garzik
>> Bitcoin core developer and open source evangelist
>> BitPay, Inc. https://bitpay.com/
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> "Accelerate Dev Cycles with Automated Cross-Browser Testing - For FREE
>> Instantly run your Selenium tests across 300+ browser/OS combos. Get
>> unparalleled scalability from the best Selenium testing platform
>> available.
>> Simple to use. Nothing to install. Get started now for free."
>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/SauceLabs
>> _______________________________________________
>> Bitcoin-development mailing list
>> Bitcoin-development at lists.sourceforge.net<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','Bitcoin-development at lists.sourceforge.net');>
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
>>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> "Accelerate Dev Cycles with Automated Cross-Browser Testing - For FREE
> Instantly run your Selenium tests across 300+ browser/OS combos. Get
> unparalleled scalability from the best Selenium testing platform available.
> Simple to use. Nothing to install. Get started now for free."http://p.sf.net/sfu/SauceLabs
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bitcoin-development mailing listBitcoin-development at lists.sourceforge.net <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','Bitcoin-development at lists.sourceforge.net');>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
>
>
>
--
There's no trick to being a humorist when you have the whole government
working for you -- Will Rodgers
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20140502/2e5065c9/attachment.html>;
Aaron Voisine [ARCHIVE] /
npub18g…knkzl
2023-06-07 15:20:47
in reply to nevent1q…tuke
Author Public Key
npub18gjvug29c4yg46lmplq38e75gg6wn5mn8taytckcsr4jt8p74h3s5knkzlPublished at
2023-06-07 15:20:47Event JSON
{
"id": "3536f6400cc18bee4d6310dd9404e4ed270d0ea1978871e4a6bae37139ec3495",
"pubkey": "3a24ce2145c5488aebfb0fc113e7d44234e9d3733afa45e2d880eb259c3eade3",
"created_at": 1686151247,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"8ba52f6cbd24b10aa5afc5a25b560c6e8e647707fdd12e939394a1e8c97861d5",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"348a1baa3ad04768c7b98ab081551e776eb933e5e9a369b4e88ae76d67245fc3",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"86f42bcb76a431c128b596c36714ae73a42cae48706a9e5513d716043447f5ec"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2014-05-02\n📝 Original message:It will also be important to chose the currency symbol for \"bits\" at the\nsame time. Lowercase stroke \"b\" I think is the obvious choice.\nUnicode U+0180\n\nAaron\n\nOn Friday, May 2, 2014, Alan Reiner \u003cetotheipi at gmail.com\u003e wrote:\n\n\u003e I've been a strong supporter of the 1e-6 unit switch since the beginning\n\u003e and ready to do whatever I can with Armory to help ease that transition.\n\u003e I'm happy to prioritize a release that updates the Armory interface to make\n\u003e \"bits\" the default unit, when the time is right. I think it makes sense to\n\u003e get as many apps and services to upgrade nearly simultaneously.\n\u003e\n\u003e My plan is to have a popup on the first load of the new version that\n\u003e briefly introduces the change, and mentions that they can go back to the\n\u003e old way in the settings, but make them work to do it. For the transient\n\u003e period (6 months?) all input boxes will auto-update nearby labels with the\n\u003e converted-to-BTC value as they type, so that they don't have to do any math\n\u003e in their head. Similarly, all displayed BTC values will show both. But\n\u003e the 1e-6 unit will always be default or first unless they explicitly change\n\u003e it in the interface.\n\u003e\n\u003e\n\u003e\n\u003e\n\u003e On 5/2/2014 8:54 PM, Ben Davenport wrote:\n\u003e\n\u003e I fully support this (it's what I suggested over a year ago), but what it\n\u003e comes down to is BitPay, Coinbase, Blockchain and Bitstamp getting\n\u003e together, agreeing what they're going to use, and doing a little joint\n\u003e customer education campaign around it. If there's community momentum around\n\u003e \"bits\", great.\n\u003e\n\u003e My only addition is that I think we should all stop trying to attach SI\n\u003e prefixes to the currency unit. Name me another world currency that uses SI\n\u003e prefixes. No one quotes amounts as 63 k$ or 3 M$. The accepted standard at\n\u003e least in the US is \u003ccurrency-symbol\u003e\u003camount\u003e\u003cmodifier\u003e, i.e. $63k or $3M.\n\u003e That may not be accepted form everywhere, but in any case it's an informal\n\u003e format, not a formal one. The important point is there should be one base\n\u003e unit that is not modified with SI prefixes. And I think the arguments are\n\u003e strong for that unit being = 100 satoshi.\n\u003e\n\u003e Ben\n\u003e\n\u003e\n\u003e\n\u003e\n\u003e On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 12:17 PM, Jeff Garzik \u003cjgarzik at bitpay.com\u003cjavascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','jgarzik at bitpay.com');\u003e\n\u003e \u003e wrote:\n\u003e\n\u003e\u003e \u003cvendor hat: on\u003e\n\u003e\u003e\n\u003e\u003e Related:\n\u003e\u003e http://blog.bitpay.com/2014/05/02/bitpay-bitcoin-and-where-to-put-that-decimal-point.html\n\u003e\u003e\n\u003e\u003e --\n\u003e\u003e Jeff Garzik\n\u003e\u003e Bitcoin core developer and open source evangelist\n\u003e\u003e BitPay, Inc. https://bitpay.com/\n\u003e\u003e\n\u003e\u003e\n\u003e\u003e ------------------------------------------------------------------------------\n\u003e\u003e \"Accelerate Dev Cycles with Automated Cross-Browser Testing - For FREE\n\u003e\u003e Instantly run your Selenium tests across 300+ browser/OS combos. Get\n\u003e\u003e unparalleled scalability from the best Selenium testing platform\n\u003e\u003e available.\n\u003e\u003e Simple to use. Nothing to install. Get started now for free.\"\n\u003e\u003e http://p.sf.net/sfu/SauceLabs\n\u003e\u003e _______________________________________________\n\u003e\u003e Bitcoin-development mailing list\n\u003e\u003e Bitcoin-development at lists.sourceforge.net\u003cjavascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','Bitcoin-development at lists.sourceforge.net');\u003e\n\u003e\u003e https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development\n\u003e\u003e\n\u003e\n\u003e\n\u003e\n\u003e ------------------------------------------------------------------------------\n\u003e \"Accelerate Dev Cycles with Automated Cross-Browser Testing - For FREE\n\u003e Instantly run your Selenium tests across 300+ browser/OS combos. Get\n\u003e unparalleled scalability from the best Selenium testing platform available.\n\u003e Simple to use. Nothing to install. Get started now for free.\"http://p.sf.net/sfu/SauceLabs\n\u003e\n\u003e\n\u003e\n\u003e _______________________________________________\n\u003e Bitcoin-development mailing listBitcoin-development at lists.sourceforge.net \u003cjavascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','Bitcoin-development at lists.sourceforge.net');\u003ehttps://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development\n\u003e\n\u003e\n\u003e\n\n-- \nThere's no trick to being a humorist when you have the whole government\nworking for you -- Will Rodgers\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20140502/2e5065c9/attachment.html\u003e",
"sig": "ba74a90075452fedaf8f2b17bd8225051143b123c33160ee9f0ea1cc96b557a1f7455e66ec9b732959f27db36915fb6b119bf2ab2259f27cd5ecc6766e6e94ce"
}