📅 Original date posted:2014-01-30
📝 Original message:On 1/30/2014 7:02 PM, Pieter Wuille wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 12:59 PM, Mike Hearn <mike at plan99.net> wrote:
>> With the way it works in bitcoinj, the tx is only committed to the wallet if
>> the server accepts the Payment message and ACKs it. So the tx would not be
>> retried if there's a failure submitting or some kind of internal server
>> error, and the UI would show that the payment failed. That seems
>> straightforward and how I'd expect things to work as a user.
> That's one right way to do it imho, but not what is suggested or
> required by the specification, and not what bitcoin core master
> currently implements.
>
If you sent the Payment message and the server goes silent after
receiving it, you retry to delivery. However, the merchant can
broadcast the transactions and force them into your wallet anyway. You
could, quite likely, pay and never get an ACK.
Chuck [ARCHIVE] /
npub1x8…hr552
2023-06-07 15:12:52
in reply to nevent1q…usmc
Author Public Key
npub1x87yrqqz5ddk5j8yrcsjqgtqdwachqxhzt6lw2ua7sru4jkjwc0qchr552Published at
2023-06-07 15:12:52Event JSON
{
"id": "351e9c85f498eab5d5b179438864df9a91123fc70538f7a22a50a574969aa60c",
"pubkey": "31fc418002a35b6a48e41e212021606bbb8b80d712f5f72b9df407cacad2761e",
"created_at": 1686150772,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"ca814c3187baf530859293da884d43f9b75d876aac144840146db91ec4b86815",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"a0fcaaf979e92df6d6952351dedf3a27d37afc1bc439143917022cd21779c90a",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"5cb21bf5d7f25a9d46879713cbd32433bbc10e40ef813a3c28fe7355f49854d6"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2014-01-30\n📝 Original message:On 1/30/2014 7:02 PM, Pieter Wuille wrote:\n\u003e On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 12:59 PM, Mike Hearn \u003cmike at plan99.net\u003e wrote:\n\u003e\u003e With the way it works in bitcoinj, the tx is only committed to the wallet if\n\u003e\u003e the server accepts the Payment message and ACKs it. So the tx would not be\n\u003e\u003e retried if there's a failure submitting or some kind of internal server\n\u003e\u003e error, and the UI would show that the payment failed. That seems\n\u003e\u003e straightforward and how I'd expect things to work as a user.\n\u003e That's one right way to do it imho, but not what is suggested or\n\u003e required by the specification, and not what bitcoin core master\n\u003e currently implements.\n\u003e\nIf you sent the Payment message and the server goes silent after \nreceiving it, you retry to delivery. However, the merchant can \nbroadcast the transactions and force them into your wallet anyway. You \ncould, quite likely, pay and never get an ACK.",
"sig": "edf0794f5b79b26ed7a9b7fcd0476d044cf22b29ea1aeb772acf269c0206757ab64cb86fb4499ece0ae7e42325610dc6e9d7351693e07893000b0aeecba8eb7e"
}