📅 Original date posted:2015-11-20
📝 Original message:On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 11:17 PM, telemaco via bitcoin-dev
<bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> Shouldn't a odbc jdbc jconnect or equivalent be totally transparent for the
> consensus code?
Yes, but we're only testing levelDB and we couldn't assure that it
won't produce unintentional consensus forks with other databases
behind the whatever db-agnostic interface.
I believe Bitcoin Core should officially support only one database at
a time. And if that is to change in the future, I don't think it
should be before a storage-agnostic libconsensus is encapsulated (and
after that there will still be risks and costs in officially
supporting several several databases simultaneously).
As has been said, these kind of experiments are welcomed outside of
bitcoin/master though.
Jorge Timón [ARCHIVE] /
npub1fx…cl2d8
2023-06-07 17:44:56
in reply to nevent1q…k30s
Author Public Key
npub1fx98zxt3lzspjs5f4msr0fxysx5euucm29ghysryju7vpc9j0jzqtcl2d8Published at
2023-06-07 17:44:56Event JSON
{
"id": "37ad4f39b69685bfb5fb58aae52898ea62d3365afefc4da739dea1cf8b49af32",
"pubkey": "498a711971f8a0194289aee037a4c481a99e731b5151724064973cc0e0b27c84",
"created_at": 1686159896,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"1210ebe800165dee2ccc94a44db020accc39bb94ffc3ab7a1da78a399947e644",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"25dd0e2d37f1da86215602cb8ed962ddd4bb28d748b5fb2bab40ade12855f865",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"6245209c1c20201ec605146a47d28ac95f2f487c530981ac57ff8e0aed2943bf"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2015-11-20\n📝 Original message:On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 11:17 PM, telemaco via bitcoin-dev\n\u003cbitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\u003e wrote:\n\u003e Shouldn't a odbc jdbc jconnect or equivalent be totally transparent for the\n\u003e consensus code?\n\nYes, but we're only testing levelDB and we couldn't assure that it\nwon't produce unintentional consensus forks with other databases\nbehind the whatever db-agnostic interface.\nI believe Bitcoin Core should officially support only one database at\na time. And if that is to change in the future, I don't think it\nshould be before a storage-agnostic libconsensus is encapsulated (and\nafter that there will still be risks and costs in officially\nsupporting several several databases simultaneously).\nAs has been said, these kind of experiments are welcomed outside of\nbitcoin/master though.",
"sig": "8e2ccda378ec3062e4feb764bff9385111ee4a900e63d84e4d5d0a8f0ea9814915fcfbbb0d2511af74a57a5341040f1fbae96778fd4707e03c3b5ef6b1083c34"
}