📅 Original date posted:2018-01-29
📝 Original message:-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: RE: NIST 8202 Blockchain Technology Overview
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2018 12:25:05 +0000
From: Yaga, Dylan (Fed) <dylan.yaga at nist.gov>
To: CANNON <cannon at cannon-ciota.info>
Thank you for your comments.
You, along with many others, expressed concern on section 8.1.2.
To help foster a full transparency approach on the editing of this section, I am sending the revised section to you for further comment.
8.1.2 Bitcoin Cash (BCH)
In 2017, Bitcoin users adopted an improvement proposal for Segregated Witness (known as SegWit, where transactions are split into two segments: transactional data, and signature data) through a soft fork. SegWit made it possible to store transactional data in a more compact form while maintaining backwards compatibility. However, a group of users had different opinions on how Bitcoin should evolve – and developed a hard fork of the Bitcoin blockchain titled Bitcoin Cash. Rather than implementing the SegWit changes, the developers of Bitcoin Cash decided to simply increase the blocksize. When the hard fork occurred, people had access to the same amount of coins on Bitcoin and Bitcoin Cash.
CANNON [ARCHIVE] /
npub145…6gmta
2023-06-07 18:10:22
in reply to nevent1q…nlve
Author Public Key
npub145wc7mvqwpndzrtzxq2nqszthnq9cq4kcpx7nwl48uqtyfzw0nmse6gmtaPublished at
2023-06-07 18:10:22Event JSON
{
"id": "378784b9c962efd16c7d854eeef2fd8256d4640a1ea40b2442eae9a4a1025d09",
"pubkey": "ad1d8f6d807066d10d62301530404bbcc05c02b6c04de9bbf53f00b2244e7cf7",
"created_at": 1686161422,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"5634a4e7015507d7a4ec005d69e3e960b35f3fc119981438b4a0169f2a09640f",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"0cd9015445a4fd1e940f448129f311d84fd1ce13e6af5b2a80e1c828a53daf26",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"ad1d8f6d807066d10d62301530404bbcc05c02b6c04de9bbf53f00b2244e7cf7"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2018-01-29\n📝 Original message:-------- Forwarded Message --------\nSubject: RE: NIST 8202 Blockchain Technology Overview\nDate: Mon, 29 Jan 2018 12:25:05 +0000\nFrom: Yaga, Dylan (Fed) \u003cdylan.yaga at nist.gov\u003e\nTo: CANNON \u003ccannon at cannon-ciota.info\u003e\n\nThank you for your comments.\nYou, along with many others, expressed concern on section 8.1.2.\nTo help foster a full transparency approach on the editing of this section, I am sending the revised section to you for further comment. \n\n8.1.2\tBitcoin Cash (BCH)\nIn 2017, Bitcoin users adopted an improvement proposal for Segregated Witness (known as SegWit, where transactions are split into two segments: transactional data, and signature data) through a soft fork. SegWit made it possible to store transactional data in a more compact form while maintaining backwards compatibility. However, a group of users had different opinions on how Bitcoin should evolve – and developed a hard fork of the Bitcoin blockchain titled Bitcoin Cash. Rather than implementing the SegWit changes, the developers of Bitcoin Cash decided to simply increase the blocksize. When the hard fork occurred, people had access to the same amount of coins on Bitcoin and Bitcoin Cash.",
"sig": "0a17bcd9c25cca09db055b69782d4e7826e4284999d84e8f7146636474c6619cb227896eb18ffb154e6798f417dfa21c93e12ccf40ec4ae80c48035238748803"
}