It was necessarily implied. He posted a picture of Christ, who didn't have children either.
Of course he didn't, we are His children (incestuous pedophilia).
Relevant to the previous discussion? You are responding to this thread, which started with basically this.
BenChampagne /
npub1x6…kndgr
2023-05-31 00:40:40
in reply to nevent1q…449t
Author Public Key
npub1x6z0j0h7dhtfu0u8d4mehtkp2swet36jt4fwg2ksmda869r3jv3qqkndgrSeen on
wss://relay.nostr.bandPublished at
2023-05-31 00:40:40Event JSON
{
"id": "010563d815bc169b10f4ad9b9f4e2eb0aad3db93056d8a05b05ce6fb10d4b2f9",
"pubkey": "3684f93efe6dd69e3f876d779baec1541d95c7525d52e42ad0db7a7d14719322",
"created_at": 1685493640,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"p",
"6a063899ace9e48e488ae3381926c1b1b842fedb8bd1e769c452032aa90b776b",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"p",
"fc89e58f5ebc31e0182185827a35b0875dd46d48a07f7675935fff5efe195992",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"e",
"3c2b19a8063c22b6c32042734dfb0bf093a55db55907e8d4293a13865e9715b3",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub",
"reply"
],
[
"mostr",
"https://nicecrew.digital/objects/3f8acf68-540d-448c-affe-6912825f284a"
]
],
"content": "It was necessarily implied. He posted a picture of Christ, who didn't have children either. \n\nOf course he didn't, we are His children (incestuous pedophilia).\n\nRelevant to the previous discussion? You are responding to this thread, which started with basically this.",
"sig": "273122545c68c445e2b533a7829db45cc4575f050a083504948d4b73b8e5ca1cc7135cb136d01d56c7cf2bf2656e74d62feeec8bc351c3b279db29a7e55ebc14"
}