📅 Original date posted:2015-06-26
📝 Original message:> Proposing inaction is not the way you convince people that bitcoin can
> scale.
>
> People and businesses cannot perform any capacity planning and future
> projections under the proposal of "economic change through inaction."
>
> There will be no growth, by your argument, until there is fee
> pressure. And what happens then?
It is not clear he is proposing "inaction." I am not sure what he is
proposing other than being against knee-jerk reactions. He has also
said he doesn't want to take on the responsibility of deciding on
whether to approve hard fork changes which is understandable considering
all the other things he is doing. Such a responsibility is probably too
much of a burden to put on any one individual no matter who it is. The
next step is to come up with a process to handle proposed hard-fork
changes other than just to ask the Core maintainer to do it.
Russ
Milly Bitcoin [ARCHIVE] /
npub1rv…hc5wt
2023-06-07 15:40:28
in reply to nevent1q…vnxk
Author Public Key
npub1rv5ajnhgrc0wq3ulrk6tcjkgsaq8h4rs5rtsvrnklz4j0lw40egqphc5wtPublished at
2023-06-07 15:40:28Event JSON
{
"id": "015002516464b38c8c4c24bbeaa864772c395fbbb15bcf5a24c35c1ff4bfc71c",
"pubkey": "1b29d94ee81e1ee0479f1db4bc4ac887407bd470a0d7060e76f8ab27fdd57e50",
"created_at": 1686152428,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"6b97b8772e4c3c0f5eb751746063b4217197a3eb7cab2fa3b16264082ad573c4",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"4ca97d1e76c890c667eac8d5e558a609738881c7d9a3c1797e73f41c3024be71",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"b25e10e25d470d9b215521b50da0dfe7a209bec7fedeb53860c3e180ffdc8c11"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2015-06-26\n📝 Original message:\u003e Proposing inaction is not the way you convince people that bitcoin can \n\u003e scale.\n\u003e\n\u003e People and businesses cannot perform any capacity planning and future \n\u003e projections under the proposal of \"economic change through inaction.\"\n\u003e\n\u003e There will be no growth, by your argument, until there is fee \n\u003e pressure. And what happens then?\n\nIt is not clear he is proposing \"inaction.\" I am not sure what he is \nproposing other than being against knee-jerk reactions. He has also \nsaid he doesn't want to take on the responsibility of deciding on \nwhether to approve hard fork changes which is understandable considering \nall the other things he is doing. Such a responsibility is probably too \nmuch of a burden to put on any one individual no matter who it is. The \nnext step is to come up with a process to handle proposed hard-fork \nchanges other than just to ask the Core maintainer to do it.\n\nRuss",
"sig": "0d5704b76a6d533dd1caba66384cf3401218ef28176c99cf965520e9be5da7649def7deafc7faa94b9416dcbdce25df845fd8ecc44ced2008a0739b151b2c2aa"
}