freetx on Nostr: Also....Liquid already supports covenants. So, it seems like the best choice to build ...
Also....Liquid already supports covenants. So, it seems like the best choice to build support for them on BTC would to build something useful / cool on Liquid and treat that as testnet.
*Disclosure: I dont have a dog in this fight, only stating the obvious path forward.*
https://medium.com/blockstream/cat-and-schnorr-tricks-ii-2f6ede3d7bb5 Can we stop calling these things "solutions to holding your own keys" and start showing what it is and what it means?
NOTHING at a protocol level removes the need to secure private keys. Every single explanation of covenants makes 0 sense to how it actually solves anything to me and explanations like this makes me think these influencers don't even know.
Published at
2024-01-20 16:09:14Event JSON
{
"id": "022f1400dc5af0ff1a7cb88758d4c947245b37e701cd57205f1ba51db51fa23c",
"pubkey": "c7fa4651ce2402880604e3c3ba1b10c33dedd25f8a78da6672a36308a777c885",
"created_at": 1705766954,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"5054f3d9e93e72f1848c50bd9e6851e79138e01554640171688dc7e1ecef82ab",
"",
"mention"
]
],
"content": "Also....Liquid already supports covenants. So, it seems like the best choice to build support for them on BTC would to build something useful / cool on Liquid and treat that as testnet.\n\n*Disclosure: I dont have a dog in this fight, only stating the obvious path forward.*\n\nhttps://medium.com/blockstream/cat-and-schnorr-tricks-ii-2f6ede3d7bb5\n\n\nnostr:note12p208k0f8ee0rpyv2z7eu6z3u7gn3cq423jqzutg3hr7rm80s24scxl57l ",
"sig": "5bae465cf191267b4a0a7cadff0f302564ec33d5ca75cf47b180aadc2a36750cef2253119c15a56a4cc799b4e28aec7e8a562641610b1df6477d1188992a2fbc"
}