Hey Ben, great article. fantastic job summarizing the current state of lightning.
Curious, if we were able to solve the UX issues around JIT channel fees, would that be good enough? If we could sufficiently lower the price of a opening a channel (via batching/channel factories) and fix the fee UX, do you think we’d still need another scaling protocol (ie ecash)?
The lightning ux problems seem theoretically solvable, no?
Alex Lewin
npub16a…76pfx
2024-01-06 20:04:55
in reply to nevent1q…h3h7
Author Public Key
npub16anjdksmvn5x08vtden04n64rw5k7fsjmedpw8avsx8wsh8ruhlq076pfxPublished at
2024-01-06 20:04:55Event JSON
{
"id": "0717c0d4fdb022284044e6d73b76ed19d35c4c6373b22da9e94d4762d0476832",
"pubkey": "d76726da1b64e8679d8b6e66facf551ba96f2612de5a171fac818ee85ce3e5fe",
"created_at": 1704571495,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"d9d01eb2606ebedaefa61c86bd8300387c016f03ba9a0f265ff3f53b1f1f0b02"
],
[
"p",
"e1ff3bfdd4e40315959b08b4fcc8245eaa514637e1d4ec2ae166b743341be1af"
]
],
"content": "Hey Ben, great article. fantastic job summarizing the current state of lightning.\n\nCurious, if we were able to solve the UX issues around JIT channel fees, would that be good enough? If we could sufficiently lower the price of a opening a channel (via batching/channel factories) and fix the fee UX, do you think we’d still need another scaling protocol (ie ecash)?\n\nThe lightning ux problems seem theoretically solvable, no?",
"sig": "8913df4faf7226a7717421a1768b940674dc4d1dc79dba4edf36d3354500981bdb0cad23bd1d1a738bb5b3915cd4cf4b29c3bf19488de6590968c8e7b69bb7b6"
}