đź“… Original date posted:2012-01-31
đź“ť Original message:BIP 20 really has no support among implementations such as Bitcoin-Qt, Electrum, MultiBit or Bitcoin-JS. As the most active and visible user facing GUI projects (all with some form of URI Scheme), their opinion carries the most weight. To a lesser degree Bitcoin-Qt has the large majority of users too (although that's a line of reasoning I'd discourage).
Normally we should probably Reject BIP 21 and re-submit a new standard (for history's sake), but as a) BIP 21 is largely a copy paste of BIP 20 sans some sections b) it is still a draft, probably the best thing here is if you all agree on something to run it by BlueMatt and then we'll make it the new BIP 21.
I can see a consensus forming on most parts. Just the send private key is contentious, and there's the topic of adding a time to expire field for merchants (this is a very good idea IMO).
Also BIP 20 is problematic because it is incompatible with about every standard on the web. All the HTML, URI and everything uses decimal numbers alone. I see no reason for breaking with tradition. Note that everytime I have to write Color or Vectorize (as a British speaker) in my code, I die a little inside. But it's convention and American English = International English. Also it would be cool if all code used a *real* international language (like Esperanto) but the world ain't perfect! We live in a decimal-counting English-speaking Windows-using God-worshipping world!
(no offense to decimal-counting English-speaking Windows-using God-worshipping world- I do half those things too :)
Amir Taaki [ARCHIVE] /
npub1ep…m3rel
2023-06-07 03:01:28
in reply to nevent1q…x973
Author Public Key
npub1ep4j5tjp6cd2774hrx96vh845dwqzhe3z7n3a2a9uxdm2dajqpgscm3relPublished at
2023-06-07 03:01:28Event JSON
{
"id": "0769743226c3263ade021c93c96f2235c69805a0364f5c9881421dbd974f12fa",
"pubkey": "c86b2a2e41d61aaf7ab7198ba65cf5a35c015f3117a71eaba5e19bb537b20051",
"created_at": 1686106888,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"c2770ee47ac360316c351f988b594e57bfe1b484641917608b0707840470fbc3",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"a23dbf6c6cc83e14cc3df4e56cc71845f611908084cfe620e83e40c06ccdd3d0"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2012-01-31\n📝 Original message:BIP 20 really has no support among implementations such as Bitcoin-Qt, Electrum, MultiBit or Bitcoin-JS. As the most active and visible user facing GUI projects (all with some form of URI Scheme), their opinion carries the most weight. To a lesser degree Bitcoin-Qt has the large majority of users too (although that's a line of reasoning I'd discourage).\n\nNormally we should probably Reject BIP 21 and re-submit a new standard (for history's sake), but as a) BIP 21 is largely a copy paste of BIP 20 sans some sections b) it is still a draft, probably the best thing here is if you all agree on something to run it by BlueMatt and then we'll make it the new BIP 21.\n\nI can see a consensus forming on most parts. Just the send private key is contentious, and there's the topic of adding a time to expire field for merchants (this is a very good idea IMO).\n\nAlso BIP 20 is problematic because it is incompatible with about every standard on the web. All the HTML, URI and everything uses decimal numbers alone. I see no reason for breaking with tradition. Note that everytime I have to write Color or Vectorize (as a British speaker) in my code, I die a little inside. But it's convention and American English = International English. Also it would be cool if all code used a *real* international language (like Esperanto) but the world ain't perfect! We live in a decimal-counting English-speaking Windows-using God-worshipping world!\n\n(no offense to decimal-counting English-speaking Windows-using God-worshipping world- I do half those things too :)",
"sig": "44e9ce0afa4cd444b77732af87060db4efaf86bfd536c3ec14b02f9c2c0f34e1ba7f5cf0cf3844d63fc6c90a0c214a9ea6075e2b1ac048848a20ac86570f8c42"
}