Mike Hearn [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2015-07-18 📝 Original message:It is worth noting that ...
📅 Original date posted:2015-07-18
📝 Original message:It is worth noting that DNS lookups can be done via Tor. In effect that
gives you 1000+ proxies instead of 56 or 4. BitcoinJ already has code that
can do this.
I would agree that it makes sense for proxying of DNS requests to be an
optional part of the protocol. Wallet developers can then compete on
privacy vs robustness vs whatever other issues there may be.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <
http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150718/fac4423c/attachment.html>
Published at
2023-06-07 15:42:16Event JSON
{
"id": "0671fccacf5989831d0b7be1df53787014510b39d152ff7394d62828c03dad57",
"pubkey": "f2c95df3766562e3b96b79a0254881c59e8639f23987846961cf55412a77f6f2",
"created_at": 1686152536,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"2b792280c7c77e1a9146c50dbbc2a8f3336e57397d73b26f225d7fe35c48cd85",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"22a0389c7de5746451e790b3067e07903c39a2b8df6ab1b42ade18776fd176ac",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"fada22460acfa5561480a4bf88a43b3c166bb0cbbda01f3099de15f2290f26fa"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2015-07-18\n📝 Original message:It is worth noting that DNS lookups can be done via Tor. In effect that\ngives you 1000+ proxies instead of 56 or 4. BitcoinJ already has code that\ncan do this.\n\nI would agree that it makes sense for proxying of DNS requests to be an\noptional part of the protocol. Wallet developers can then compete on\nprivacy vs robustness vs whatever other issues there may be.\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150718/fac4423c/attachment.html\u003e",
"sig": "98d9cde96d2afe0f9cd749c07ba7635a66750decb3efdb96afd8c9dee5d00388cfcc6b6271f3a0b167d927c32f26ade9d041688030c08330934f35770bbe71e1"
}