The study does indeed show the ill effects of the S protein - as would happen if one was infected by the virus - but the vaccine is designed to instruct the ribosome to produce a mere fraction of the S protein. So this study pertains more to the infection by virus itself and is not a study of the vaccine.
We could argue to the end of days about the safety of that fragment (just as prior vaccines used attenuated organism for the immune system to practice on leading to full immunity).
Then of course it is a simulated full S protein representing infection, not vaccination and using hamsters as a proxy.
And another area that I feel you make difficult to refute is your assertion that there's an absence of information and that peer review is corrupted. This is exactly why the scientific method exists. Consensus and proof of work is designed to filter out rogue agents (exactly how blockchain solves double spend)
Put simply if you think the absence of info is proof of your view, then it is impossible for anyone to prove you wrong.
Personally I find it very hard to believe that 50 million doctors and 110 million scientists could pull such a serious fraud without someone snitching on the gang.
I do understand that suspicion of anything introduced to the body should be greeted with wariness. And mRNA requires we trust that a mechanism in our bodies has been hijacked to produce these proteins in a (one would hope) non toxic and short term way.
btw I have a medical background and was extremely wary of this new technique. I did not find confidence in any one opinion. My confidence arrived after determining the consensus opinion after reading about 130 studies. Only then I got vaccinated
I think one failing in the science was - though understandable under a global emergency situation - there was quite a rush to get this sorted quickly and that doctors and scientists (and politicians) could have spent more time explaining to ease people's concerns
Thanks for you input. I'm glad we at least agree on ketogenic concepts. I still believe good food and proper living is the best way to delete illness. When you really think of it, we should never need to have any kind of medicine if only people would eat and exercise correctly
Mischa /
npub1wz…7nnlg
2023-04-20 02:26:18
in reply to nevent1q…gmx3
Author Public Key
npub1wzuqzlhall5zk7yvhmvj8x30fh4rsz4374t5fs4d922f0w4pyd0qa7nnlgPublished at
2023-04-20 02:26:18Event JSON
{
"id": "0e7fb70b63dd6c3c9fc70f6e7772018e95b6b141d1c0a32e6db72ff8f14f9ef9",
"pubkey": "70b8017efdffe82b788cbed9239a2f4dea380ab1f55744c2ad2a9497baa1235e",
"created_at": 1681957578,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"117ce8e19b9736fab0ed578bd53b1a1f803d9184cb0f708485175ef3f4bf90c3",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"a1fbe38c2bdd9c5f432ec7a62d550a0d67cc3324f8c86658f56b1aac855dd790",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"ec99edc5567e02815fb15020285e2fa8390931cedf59c83d6bb2c5f6ee1530b9"
],
[
"p",
"8ea485266b2285463b13bf835907161c22bb3da1e652b443db14f9cee6720a43"
],
[
"p",
"70b8017efdffe82b788cbed9239a2f4dea380ab1f55744c2ad2a9497baa1235e"
]
],
"content": "The study does indeed show the ill effects of the S protein - as would happen if one was infected by the virus - but the vaccine is designed to instruct the ribosome to produce a mere fraction of the S protein. So this study pertains more to the infection by virus itself and is not a study of the vaccine.\n\nWe could argue to the end of days about the safety of that fragment (just as prior vaccines used attenuated organism for the immune system to practice on leading to full immunity). \n\nThen of course it is a simulated full S protein representing infection, not vaccination and using hamsters as a proxy.\n\nAnd another area that I feel you make difficult to refute is your assertion that there's an absence of information and that peer review is corrupted. This is exactly why the scientific method exists. Consensus and proof of work is designed to filter out rogue agents (exactly how blockchain solves double spend)\n\nPut simply if you think the absence of info is proof of your view, then it is impossible for anyone to prove you wrong.\n\nPersonally I find it very hard to believe that 50 million doctors and 110 million scientists could pull such a serious fraud without someone snitching on the gang.\n\nI do understand that suspicion of anything introduced to the body should be greeted with wariness. And mRNA requires we trust that a mechanism in our bodies has been hijacked to produce these proteins in a (one would hope) non toxic and short term way. \n\nbtw I have a medical background and was extremely wary of this new technique. I did not find confidence in any one opinion. My confidence arrived after determining the consensus opinion after reading about 130 studies. Only then I got vaccinated\n\nI think one failing in the science was - though understandable under a global emergency situation - there was quite a rush to get this sorted quickly and that doctors and scientists (and politicians) could have spent more time explaining to ease people's concerns\n\nThanks for you input. I'm glad we at least agree on ketogenic concepts. I still believe good food and proper living is the best way to delete illness. When you really think of it, we should never need to have any kind of medicine if only people would eat and exercise correctly",
"sig": "0c28636df5f21a0f9bdba6c0736689f1775570f14b92a88342ce83cea8a24fa0158b4999ed95c87d169a5601ee98ef3bf643b48ed11e3e23689e0447145657f2"
}