Why Nostr? What is Njump?
2023-06-07 11:37:37
in reply to

Luke-Jr [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2013-03-12 📝 Original message:On Tuesday, March 12, 2013 ...

📅 Original date posted:2013-03-12
📝 Original message:On Tuesday, March 12, 2013 7:03:54 AM Alan Reiner wrote:
> I'm sure it won't be long before Slashdot and a variety of sources start
> reporting on this event. Bitcoin has been in the media a lot lately, so
> this story is likely to get some attention. The blowback of this event
> is mostly psychological, so I think it would be exceptionally wise to
> start preparing PR comments that can be posted on articles immediately
> after they go public. This event is likely draw much more negative
> attention than it deserves, and getting some positive&informed comments
> posted up front will potentially make a difference in the way the story
> is received.
>
> Undoubtedly, many articles (and especially commenters) will shape this
> into "the end of Bitcoin". I would describe it as "there was a short
> and mostly-harmless lapse in the ability of the network to reach a
> consensus, causing transactions to get delayed by a few hours." It
> *really* needs to be emphasized that coins are safe, and nothing anyone
> has/could do will change that. And that it would've been extremely
> difficult to exploit for gain. Transactions got delayed while a bug was
> fixed. End of story.

I think we should be careful not to downplay the reality either.
For a number of hours, transactions could have received up to N confirmations
and then still been reversed. While we could contact the bigger payment
processors, I saw people still trying to buy/sell on OTC, whom could have been
scammed even by taking standard precautions.

Luke
Author Public Key
npub1dtr22xd42nv07un2xq0rmtkqkjylgsmexau0anxxafa9xmmn2ncshu7wrs