Event JSON
{
"id": "05e501e610db7930dbd1a144794fa6b2f823c065e34b805b61db386b63055c76",
"pubkey": "3f59b5c878411d8ef6a2bd9d4c4c690c030820c0ec185101cc963fa7b3043475",
"created_at": 1688392320,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"t",
"andrewperez"
],
[
"t",
"juliarock"
],
[
"t",
"rebeccaburns"
],
[
"t",
"jacobin"
],
[
"t",
"wealthtax"
],
[
"t",
"wealth"
],
[
"t",
"tax"
],
[
"t",
"superrich"
],
[
"t",
"incomeinequality"
],
[
"t",
"inequality"
],
[
"t",
"corruption"
],
[
"t",
"supremecourt"
],
[
"t",
"SCOTUS"
],
[
"proxy",
"https://kolektiva.social/users/shades/statuses/110650479147063061",
"activitypub"
]
],
"content": "by #AndrewPerez, #JuliaRock \u0026 #RebeccaBurns in #Jacobin: \n\n\"The Supreme Court just agreed to hear a case next term that could preempt Congress and the Biden administration from instituting a federal wealth tax — another potentially lucrative gift for conservative justices’ billionaire benefactors and the superrich. A think tank affiliated with some of those benefactors recently pressed the court to accept the case and outlaw such taxes.\"\n\nhttps://jacobin.com/2023/06/supreme-court-moore-v-united-states-wealth-tax-superrich\n\n#WealthTax #wealth #tax #SuperRich #IncomeInequality #inequality #corruption #SupremeCourt #SCOTUS",
"sig": "a08b8a62ae5716bde61e1fb08666a70698540043c7f8d9a80138c26a319425341d0b4f23356225aeb4bcedff5598f92035272e0c7b75ad96c6c8a2d3c6cb42de"
}