robinseyr on Nostr: #Bitcoin miners could censor and manipulate transactions. Wouldn't it be possible to ...
#Bitcoin miners could censor and manipulate transactions. Wouldn't it be possible to just buy 51% of the network?
⇒ NO!
Performing a 51% Attack on #BTC seems easy, but in practice it's not possible.
Here is why:
Tremendous amount of Resources needed
⇒ To successfully perform such an attack, you would need to control more than half of the total hashing power.
⇒ This would require a massive investment in mining hardware, electricity, and infrastructure, making the attack financially unfeasible.
⇒ Where do you even get all this hardware with massive shortages?
⇒ Additionally, during such an attack would the network grow even more. Thus, increasing the cost of such an attack more and more.
⇒ It's an uphill battle...
No gains = no incentive
⇒ Even if someone manages to do that, the difficulty adjustment doesn't work in your favor, and you needed to maintain the power over a longer period of time to really make an impact.
⇒ And all those resources would be for nothing, because all those mined #BTC would be worthless at that point.
⇒ So you have 0 gains and therefore 0 incentive to do such an attack.
⇒ The financial gain would be much bigger, if the miners simply play by the rules.
A 51% Attack on #Bitcoin is not only physically impossible, but also would bankrupt the player who performs it.
Proving that #Bitcoin is actually the only sound digital money on the planet!
Published at
2023-04-28 20:00:02Event JSON
{
"id": "05f6ddb8e9be244db3f0f3a600c57a96964dbd0ac0e1804bdee590009921cc33",
"pubkey": "6979ff5339f4ba792a65885eebc35e6e0e8d2a89bfe5655b4f8a8bf98e7bb499",
"created_at": 1682712002,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"t",
"bitcoin"
],
[
"t",
"btc"
],
[
"t",
"btc"
],
[
"t",
"bitcoin"
],
[
"t",
"bitcoin"
]
],
"content": "#Bitcoin miners could censor and manipulate transactions. Wouldn't it be possible to just buy 51% of the network? \n⇒ NO!\n\nPerforming a 51% Attack on #BTC seems easy, but in practice it's not possible. \n\nHere is why: \n\nTremendous amount of Resources needed\n⇒ To successfully perform such an attack, you would need to control more than half of the total hashing power. \n⇒ This would require a massive investment in mining hardware, electricity, and infrastructure, making the attack financially unfeasible. \n⇒ Where do you even get all this hardware with massive shortages?\n⇒ Additionally, during such an attack would the network grow even more. Thus, increasing the cost of such an attack more and more.\n⇒ It's an uphill battle...\n\nNo gains = no incentive \n⇒ Even if someone manages to do that, the difficulty adjustment doesn't work in your favor, and you needed to maintain the power over a longer period of time to really make an impact. \n⇒ And all those resources would be for nothing, because all those mined #BTC would be worthless at that point. \n⇒ So you have 0 gains and therefore 0 incentive to do such an attack. \n⇒ The financial gain would be much bigger, if the miners simply play by the rules. \n\nA 51% Attack on #Bitcoin is not only physically impossible, but also would bankrupt the player who performs it. \n\nProving that #Bitcoin is actually the only sound digital money on the planet!",
"sig": "2f951537cbeb78d63616ac667b2300bb586276f27365240094d556411b9920c0e48b15a9348804040de9ac6e2502f12b276a17a65b1accdd27d5cea29a1f4183"
}