📅 Original date posted:2023-03-02
🗒️ Summary of this message: Calvin plans to use service bit 24 to signal Utreexo capable nodes on testnet and signet, with plans to release binaries for utreexo node in the coming months.
📝 Original message:On March 2, 2023 6:20:35 PM GMT, Luke Dashjr via bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>This sounds like something that should be written up as a BIP and use a normal service bit assignment...?
The purpose of the experimental service bits is experiments. If the details of utreexo aren't nailed down and may change, an experimental service bit makes sense.
Bit 24 is fine and AFAIK unused at the moment; full-rbf is using bit 26: https://github.com/petertodd/bitcoin/commit/c15b8d70778238abfa751e4216a97140be6369af#diff-8e2ffc8fe0e0847a6aac311a93b2faeebd2d76ddb2c81741bb8cf7448287807eR297
>Luke
>
>
>On 3/2/23 01:55, kcalvinalvin via bitcoin-dev wrote:
>> Hello all,
>>
>> Wanted to tell the mailing list that I'll be using service bit 24 (1 << 24) to signal that nodes are Utreexo capable nodes on testnet and signet as requested by the comment in protocol.h in bitcoind (https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/74981aa02d2b14ad1c0b82d1eb09cf3169eaa8ae/src/protocol.h#L295-L301). There are plans to release binaries for the utreexo node (github.com/utreexo/utreexod) in the next few months so that power users can try it out. I have no plans to release binaries for mainnet yet.
>>
>> Do let me know if someone else is using the same bit to signal for something else and we can coordinate accordingly.
>>
>> Best,
>> Calvin
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> bitcoin-dev mailing list
>> bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org
>> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
>_______________________________________________
>bitcoin-dev mailing list
>bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org
>https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
Peter Todd [ARCHIVE] /
npub1m2…a2np2
2023-06-07 23:20:17
in reply to nevent1q…336f
Author Public Key
npub1m230cem2yh3mtdzkg32qhj73uytgkyg5ylxsu083n3tpjnajxx4qqa2np2Published at
2023-06-07 23:20:17Event JSON
{
"id": "080289fd2b2f40a9cfb9341c301fd3f841f2923ded0948e5a849aa109c35283c",
"pubkey": "daa2fc676a25e3b5b45644540bcbd1e1168b111427cd0e3cf19c56194fb231aa",
"created_at": 1686180017,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"995aa32f38609282619e51d203b2d277e47693aa64c648b5f59d95c60fce5c6c",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"d55fb1b3b499138f9a95cde697346b195a051585dcd1ee3f65e4814de7f257dc",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"5a6d1f44482b67b5b0d30cc1e829b66a251f0dc99448377dbe3c5e0faf6c3803"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2023-03-02\n🗒️ Summary of this message: Calvin plans to use service bit 24 to signal Utreexo capable nodes on testnet and signet, with plans to release binaries for utreexo node in the coming months.\n📝 Original message:On March 2, 2023 6:20:35 PM GMT, Luke Dashjr via bitcoin-dev \u003cbitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\u003e wrote:\n\u003eThis sounds like something that should be written up as a BIP and use a normal service bit assignment...?\n\nThe purpose of the experimental service bits is experiments. If the details of utreexo aren't nailed down and may change, an experimental service bit makes sense.\n\nBit 24 is fine and AFAIK unused at the moment; full-rbf is using bit 26: https://github.com/petertodd/bitcoin/commit/c15b8d70778238abfa751e4216a97140be6369af#diff-8e2ffc8fe0e0847a6aac311a93b2faeebd2d76ddb2c81741bb8cf7448287807eR297\n\n\u003eLuke\n\u003e\n\u003e\n\u003eOn 3/2/23 01:55, kcalvinalvin via bitcoin-dev wrote:\n\u003e\u003e Hello all,\n\u003e\u003e \n\u003e\u003e Wanted to tell the mailing list that I'll be using service bit 24 (1 \u003c\u003c 24) to signal that nodes are Utreexo capable nodes on testnet and signet as requested by the comment in protocol.h in bitcoind (https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/74981aa02d2b14ad1c0b82d1eb09cf3169eaa8ae/src/protocol.h#L295-L301). There are plans to release binaries for the utreexo node (github.com/utreexo/utreexod) in the next few months so that power users can try it out. I have no plans to release binaries for mainnet yet.\n\u003e\u003e \n\u003e\u003e Do let me know if someone else is using the same bit to signal for something else and we can coordinate accordingly.\n\u003e\u003e \n\u003e\u003e Best,\n\u003e\u003e Calvin\n\u003e\u003e \n\u003e\u003e _______________________________________________\n\u003e\u003e bitcoin-dev mailing list\n\u003e\u003e bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\n\u003e\u003e https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev\n\u003e_______________________________________________\n\u003ebitcoin-dev mailing list\n\u003ebitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\n\u003ehttps://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev",
"sig": "3b68fa669f153dc8b34ed4697546e1fa21749856d139be724d53372cf739817c9aad3deeaa5e380a527d838c37d22f23ad7027ffae43010e8e1db6093ad96aad"
}