Isidor Zeuner [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2015-02-04 📝 Original message:Hi there, comments ...
📅 Original date posted:2015-02-04
📝 Original message:Hi there,
comments in-line:
> > I later wrote up the idea in the context of adding Zerocoin to
> > Bitcoin:
> >
> >
http://www.mail-archive.com/bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net/msg02472.html> >
For the sake of maximum clarity with respect to modelling the value of
a Bitcoin, I don't think that approaches which change the number
of coins that can possibly be circulated should be encouraged.
So, I like the idea of having the "sacrificed" coins appearing in the
mining fees in a future block. But what is meant with OP_DEPTH in this
context? From what I read, this operation just manipulates the stack
size when evaluating the script, so I don't see how it would
affect miner incentives.
Best regards,
Isidor
Published at
2023-06-07 15:29:34Event JSON
{
"id": "0821f352e963a87120f90b5a39085b8ef67be8c61c5e0580983c08bfc68f7773",
"pubkey": "70950d9ef527ee56cd47d1cec909c3ddfa69de32fbea13cad10641ee6dc93e39",
"created_at": 1686151774,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"5690baaf42fe1a11c5ec6892772a1dd07449297a26a7517e9ff22f94024d794e",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"a23dbf6c6cc83e14cc3df4e56cc71845f611908084cfe620e83e40c06ccdd3d0"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2015-02-04\n📝 Original message:Hi there,\n\ncomments in-line:\n\n\u003e \u003e I later wrote up the idea in the context of adding Zerocoin to\n\u003e \u003e Bitcoin:\n\u003e \u003e\n\u003e \u003e http://www.mail-archive.com/bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net/msg02472.html\n\u003e \u003e\n\nFor the sake of maximum clarity with respect to modelling the value of\na Bitcoin, I don't think that approaches which change the number\nof coins that can possibly be circulated should be encouraged.\n\nSo, I like the idea of having the \"sacrificed\" coins appearing in the\nmining fees in a future block. But what is meant with OP_DEPTH in this\ncontext? From what I read, this operation just manipulates the stack\nsize when evaluating the script, so I don't see how it would\naffect miner incentives.\n\nBest regards,\n\nIsidor",
"sig": "6921859ed4f13311d2379fe3eebf36c8126f6972d6082392ade98db1b98fca2cd6346612af162599ef11b1ff07c805b010ce21560d5e1da9f9df693932a74ef0"
}