馃搮 Original date posted:2017-07-12
馃摑 Original message:On 12 Jul 2017 2:31 pm, "Tom Zander via bitcoin-dev" <
bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
On Monday, 10 July 2017 20:38:08 CEST Jorge Tim贸n via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> I think anything less than 1 year after release of tested code by some
> implementation would be irresponsible for any hardfork, even a very
> simple one.
Good news!
Code to support 2x (the hard fork part of the proposal) has been out and
tested for much longer than that.
Not true. It's different code on top of segwit. The first attempt in btc1
(very recent) didn't even increased the size (because it changed the
meaningless "base size" without touching the weight limit. As for the
current code, I don't think it has been properly tested today, let alone
"for mucj longer than 1 year.
Anyway, I said, one year from tested release. Segwitx2 hasn't been
released, has it? If so, too late to discuss a bip imo, the bip may end up
being different from what has been released due to feedback (unless it is
ignored again, of course).
--
Tom Zander
Blog: https://zander.github.io
Vlog: https://vimeo.com/channels/tomscryptochannel
_______________________________________________
bitcoin-dev mailing list
bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20170712/a122e604/attachment-0001.html>;
Jorge Tim贸n [ARCHIVE] /
npub1fx鈥l2d8
2023-06-07 18:04:05
in reply to nevent1q鈥yqd
Author Public Key
npub1fx98zxt3lzspjs5f4msr0fxysx5euucm29ghysryju7vpc9j0jzqtcl2d8Published at
2023-06-07 18:04:05Event JSON
{
"id": "0825563956681f8e094101c353b1c43d6db22611e2ca6ef5da9fa436c7dfe0d7",
"pubkey": "498a711971f8a0194289aee037a4c481a99e731b5151724064973cc0e0b27c84",
"created_at": 1686161045,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"74e46143b6146bfbf41855e76069c36a2cf73fb16bb2644a1bf3b792696fbbf0",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"2d0ee73ee374e7dcca7480bf857d2045ff974558e58f9861c982e3f5637fde2b",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"9a463e0fab8963b013698c15a0f2449d19c97f3b88458e5874095b5006df9a0c"
]
],
"content": "馃搮 Original date posted:2017-07-12\n馃摑 Original message:On 12 Jul 2017 2:31 pm, \"Tom Zander via bitcoin-dev\" \u003c\nbitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\u003e wrote:\n\nOn Monday, 10 July 2017 20:38:08 CEST Jorge Tim贸n via bitcoin-dev wrote:\n\u003e I think anything less than 1 year after release of tested code by some\n\u003e implementation would be irresponsible for any hardfork, even a very\n\u003e simple one.\n\nGood news!\n\nCode to support 2x (the hard fork part of the proposal) has been out and\ntested for much longer than that.\n\n\nNot true. It's different code on top of segwit. The first attempt in btc1\n(very recent) didn't even increased the size (because it changed the\nmeaningless \"base size\" without touching the weight limit. As for the\ncurrent code, I don't think it has been properly tested today, let alone\n\"for mucj longer than 1 year.\nAnyway, I said, one year from tested release. Segwitx2 hasn't been\nreleased, has it? If so, too late to discuss a bip imo, the bip may end up\nbeing different from what has been released due to feedback (unless it is\nignored again, of course).\n\n\n--\nTom Zander\nBlog: https://zander.github.io\nVlog: https://vimeo.com/channels/tomscryptochannel\n_______________________________________________\nbitcoin-dev mailing list\nbitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\nhttps://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20170712/a122e604/attachment-0001.html\u003e",
"sig": "a7160a361616c5749c60977b67d654060dfd7aa63cedb5e2da96b6cf0e659915b8e9453b8b0dcb1fc702b0c762f1bfc66626182d8a727b1562893d66c514723e"
}