Milly Bitcoin [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2015-07-17 📝 Original message:> My "relationships" are ...
📅 Original date posted:2015-07-17
📝 Original message:> My "relationships" are nothing more than people
> being willing to talk to me, ask me for advice, and warn me about
> possible threats. They're not legal contracts.
Your actions make it appear as if you attack companies with the hope of
landing consulting fees. I assume if companies hire you as a consultant
or put you on some advisory board then you stop badmouthing them. These
type of developer attacks are a high risk issue due to the small number
of developers who have been given authority by the github gatekeeper and
the lack of an incentive system for Bitcoin devlelopers.
I have been suggesting a systematic risk analysis to reduce the
probability of such an attack. If you have a systematic risk analysis
then when there are issue you judge it against a standard. That
replaces the current situation where developers haphazardly make claims
in twitter, Reddit, and blog posts and create drama and confusion.
Russ
Published at
2023-06-07 15:42:24Event JSON
{
"id": "087a9416e07710dcd2402584597a61be2f37d1a94aa143547f3135df14bf95ca",
"pubkey": "1b29d94ee81e1ee0479f1db4bc4ac887407bd470a0d7060e76f8ab27fdd57e50",
"created_at": 1686152544,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"8cfdb6ed676e52875cd3360f4e3b9fd8a9125080a56694ae91a3defb5a52e9fc",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"bdfc05c43fe76354b0ceb0950ce42d47114751141f2d199f2c00042ed7b440a7",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"daa2fc676a25e3b5b45644540bcbd1e1168b111427cd0e3cf19c56194fb231aa"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2015-07-17\n📝 Original message:\u003e My \"relationships\" are nothing more than people\n\u003e being willing to talk to me, ask me for advice, and warn me about\n\u003e possible threats. They're not legal contracts.\n\nYour actions make it appear as if you attack companies with the hope of \nlanding consulting fees. I assume if companies hire you as a consultant \nor put you on some advisory board then you stop badmouthing them. These \ntype of developer attacks are a high risk issue due to the small number \nof developers who have been given authority by the github gatekeeper and \nthe lack of an incentive system for Bitcoin devlelopers.\n\nI have been suggesting a systematic risk analysis to reduce the \nprobability of such an attack. If you have a systematic risk analysis \nthen when there are issue you judge it against a standard. That \nreplaces the current situation where developers haphazardly make claims \nin twitter, Reddit, and blog posts and create drama and confusion.\n\nRuss",
"sig": "ddc37f292444f58905937e86f886773daab400c2b014e9970bb1c03767a44eb956f3587a395b32f3a2580ad1128a70d887a28727f227c3e3673ae3815cbecc29"
}