laanwj on Nostr: speaking of which, it seems a bit arbitrary to me that nostr went with inline images ...

speaking of which, it seems a bit arbitrary to me that nostr went with inline images (against the NIP-01 spec saying "plaintext"), instead of attachment-style images like twitter and other social media

quoting
nevent1q…hl2h

i just realized one thing NIP-01 lacks is the unwritten(?) rules how clients actually display NIP-01, it mentions that the messages are strictly plaintext but that's not true in practice
e.g. like "a link that ends in an image format like .jpg, .png or .webp is displayed inline as an image"
don't know if there's more