No, I disagree with fiatjaf (npub180c…h6w6) that the UX would not be much different.
With Pablo's proposal, once a user fires of the kind:1777 to initiate migration, if your client supports it, depending on how the client implements it, you would not be seeing the attackers notes, or they would have a red border and warning signs telling you that these notes were written after the valid kind:1777.
Today the client has no way to know. With kind:1777 your client can now warn you about the situation.
Of course it's not a mandatory feature. But it's very central and I think any client that relies on kind:3 or other lists will want to implement it.
The 90 days was an idea to prevent front-running by a few clients, as we have seen in the past, it's how long the fast implementers wait as a curtesey to the others, not a deadline.
bu5hm4nn /
npub1hl…dz5wg
2023-11-03 00:00:37
in reply to nevent1q…kczl
Author Public Key
npub1hlq93jdtkfg29a8s7fqzzzh82q3pkc20rxucwt4geh6e56wk3y2qxdz5wgPublished at
2023-11-03 00:00:37Event JSON
{
"id": "000003e77b5f82518612f4ed18bd9eff5bffbc975158ece5214058ba86485284",
"pubkey": "bfc058c9abb250a2f4f0f240210ae750221b614f19b9872ea8cdf59a69d68914",
"created_at": 1698969637,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"client",
"gossip"
],
[
"p",
"3bf0c63fcb93463407af97a5e5ee64fa883d107ef9e558472c4eb9aaaefa459d"
],
[
"p",
"347a2370900d19b4e4756221594e8bda706ae5c785de09e59e4605f91a03f49c"
],
[
"p",
"fa984bd7dbb282f07e16e7ae87b26a2a7b9b90b7246a44771f0cf5ae58018f52"
],
[
"p",
"97c70a44366a6535c145b333f973ea86dfdc2d7a99da618c40c64705ad98e322"
],
[
"p",
"460c25e682fda7832b52d1f22d3d22b3176d972f60dcdc3212ed8c92ef85065c"
],
[
"p",
"32e1827635450ebb3c5a7d12c1f8e7b2b514439ac10a67eef3d9fd9c5c68e245"
],
[
"p",
"1739d937dc8c0c7370aa27585938c119e25c41f6c441a5d34c6d38503e3136ef"
],
[
"p",
"1bc70a0148b3f316da33fe3c89f23e3e71ac4ff998027ec712b905cd24f6a411"
],
[
"p",
"7bdef7be22dd8e59f4600e044aa53a1cf975a9dc7d27df5833bc77db784a5805"
],
[
"e",
"00000341e87b6a7197701ee6efc713200f45e3a0c737fac5f2dd85c1e75f078a",
"wss://relay.damus.io/",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"57b61a7e5c5005d17141353a02c640825bb1d739754658f67f10edefeb435cd9",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub/",
"reply"
],
[
"nonce",
"16602069666339697825",
"22"
]
],
"content": "No, I disagree with nostr:npub180cvv07tjdrrgpa0j7j7tmnyl2yr6yr7l8j4s3evf6u64th6gkwsyjh6w6 that the UX would not be much different.\n\nWith Pablo's proposal, once a user fires of the kind:1777 to initiate migration, if your client supports it, depending on how the client implements it, you would not be seeing the attackers notes, or they would have a red border and warning signs telling you that these notes were written after the valid kind:1777.\n\nToday the client has no way to know. With kind:1777 your client can now warn you about the situation.\n\nOf course it's not a mandatory feature. But it's very central and I think any client that relies on kind:3 or other lists will want to implement it.\n\nThe 90 days was an idea to prevent front-running by a few clients, as we have seen in the past, it's how long the fast implementers wait as a curtesey to the others, not a deadline.",
"sig": "9832bf3c4ea40fd616f6327cb6f1eb14d72ff7a575b84917b47d04e52d16883dba8119ed825996bae8ff58825c304581eea9d6cbec668cb7d51be82444199fcf"
}