freemymind 🇨🇭 on Nostr: He is basically arguing with utilitarianism while most would argue with kantist ...

He is basically arguing with utilitarianism while most would argue with kantist reasoning. You have to will that a rule counts for everyone, in order to be just.

While utilitarianism argues that methods are legitimized by their results.

It is completely different logical systems that sometimes can come to similar results. And in extreme cases like this they heavily contradict.

One can not will, that justice is spoken by the police without any saying of a judge as Peter is defending it.