📅 Original date posted:2014-10-19
📝 Original message:On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 9:17 AM, xor <xor at freenetproject.org> wrote:
> So as a random stranger to the project, I would vote against that if I was
> allowed to. There really should be *more* discussion here, and splitting the
> list up won't help with that.
The problem is not one of traffic, but of confusion of concerns, and of focus.
That specific questions about Bitcoin Core are being asked, for
example about watch-only functionality, in the same list where changes
to the entire system (BIPs) should be decided on doesn't make sense.
This has in practice caused some developers of alternative clients to
not subscribe to this list, even though they *should* follow BIP
discussion otherwise it makes no sense to have a process in the first
place.
Wladimir
Wladimir [ARCHIVE] /
npub1xq…ymc2p
2023-06-07 15:26:32
in reply to nevent1q…l457
Author Public Key
npub1xqshkqv2g7uea4xzqwvmgjcz7u8vfavw6aazs999v0azsv3w7u3qpymc2pSeen on
wss://relay.nostr.bandPublished at
2023-06-07 15:26:32Event JSON
{
"id": "0984ff5d70a0fa7b96643cafb81e757bad9a0d1061b46e7eb18681bebf8fa62a",
"pubkey": "30217b018a47b99ed4c20399b44b02f70ec4f58ed77a2814a563fa28322ef722",
"created_at": 1686151592,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"8e8ffc86b671332d74dc30a93d73d86bf0648414fedbd225ac787a9a2713f3b5",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"b78e157409da0474d3e4af348c9bbef939253014104bc636bad53f3053b9d316",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"fdf31024ca0537ed828d895ddc8525f8af023f0dc935a8327a8a496d0d7a9f83"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2014-10-19\n📝 Original message:On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 9:17 AM, xor \u003cxor at freenetproject.org\u003e wrote:\n\n\u003e So as a random stranger to the project, I would vote against that if I was\n\u003e allowed to. There really should be *more* discussion here, and splitting the\n\u003e list up won't help with that.\n\nThe problem is not one of traffic, but of confusion of concerns, and of focus.\n\nThat specific questions about Bitcoin Core are being asked, for\nexample about watch-only functionality, in the same list where changes\nto the entire system (BIPs) should be decided on doesn't make sense.\n\nThis has in practice caused some developers of alternative clients to\nnot subscribe to this list, even though they *should* follow BIP\ndiscussion otherwise it makes no sense to have a process in the first\nplace.\n\nWladimir",
"sig": "5ede4186795aeb8f21c6a050e2018441151510044bcd0c78ab4920805f2bd4b29134f078f4292a2e37422721526eb7ba719005b2fef561ac2cc39cbc3eea3a6b"
}