Event JSON
{
"id": "0facb3bfefb00e89cd0807dc5c508547bb15604aa6c004983a08cf2ef561633e",
"pubkey": "4072912b37efcb655f9d23ec0eb8dd091cece50c11747b97f1893a4ab842b0f1",
"created_at": 1715522941,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"t",
"evs"
],
[
"proxy",
"https://newsie.social/@TheConversationUS/112428511465817411",
"web"
],
[
"proxy",
"https://newsie.social/users/TheConversationUS/statuses/112428511465817411",
"activitypub"
],
[
"L",
"pink.momostr"
],
[
"l",
"pink.momostr.activitypub:https://newsie.social/users/TheConversationUS/statuses/112428511465817411",
"pink.momostr"
]
],
"content": "Despite the rapid technology advances in #EVs, they still present safety challenges.\nOne of the inherent issues is the heaviness of EVs – meaning other vehicles bear the burden of absorbing more crash energy in collisions. This dilemma is central to the concept of “crash compatibility,” a well-established field of safety research. \nSolutions include lightweight materials, more powerful sensing technologies and safety algorithms, improved seat belts and better airbags. \nhttps://theconversation.com/electric-vehicles-are-usually-safer-for-their-occupants-but-not-necessarily-for-everyone-else-223535",
"sig": "d30d8bec088632700929ca4d91a9a48377147ed8167ac9bd1b009ea7b078cc6ecb7a022cf23c7ae6104a9feb45ef6c135080ab034d2c6e951ff65b0d9b92d19e"
}