mleku on Nostr: this new information that someone pointed me at, regarding the myriad of ...

this new information that someone pointed me at, regarding the myriad of inconsistencies in the narratives around nuclear weapons has quite changed my mood

now i'm like, when i hear all these stories about nuclear weapons development, i'm like, yawn. it's just firebombs contaminated with uranium, they are not real, and nobody's city is going to get turned into a glass carpark or anything.

much more serious is the drone warfare. but even then, since i wish to have no part in any war ever, i also know that being away from industrial production centers and dense populations is pretty much enough because they can't waste their expensive resources chasing after hillbillies like me, there's just no strategic or tactical reason for it, it doesn't have the intimidating or terrifying optics, and in every case in history, when armies have been dragged into fighting mountain people it's a quagmire, the romans stupidly did it, the turks, vietnam and afghanistan were both also mostly wars by conventional soldiers against hillbillies, the lack of easy roads and the high expense of helicopters and the lack of ability to see through rocks the size of the average hill country makes them extremely bad places to try and attack with conventional standing armies. in fact very often in such places you can just hide out in caves and underground tunnels and such and they just pass over a few times and give up because there's too much cover and too much area to scan. this is why the americans used herbicides on the forest in vietnam, but still lost.

the debunking of several of these grandiose and improbable, in fact impossible weapons technologies has been a theme of the last few years for me. first was HAARP, which was probably a legit experiment at one point but completely failed, and was associated with the chemtrail spraying stuff. i already know well enough that a lot of what people call "chemtrails" are just the result of fuel additives used in commercial aircraft which have been promoted actively by military strategists and fostered by government as a way to improve weapons manufacturing. the main fruit of HAARP was probably actually some small improvements in radar imaging and orbital communications systems, which obviously are also entirely military use cases.

i'm not so happy about the drone thing tho, but i am not surprised because drones just are the latest chapter in a long arc of the development of ballistic weapons systems, in the 80s and 90s these were a big deal, and are starting to fade in importance because drones can be fully autonomous and without radio signatures and fly under the radar and strike targets intelligently, even, there is one project that made devices about the size of a mobile phone with shape charges that can recognise people by ethnicity and selectively target them.

these are a bit more scary but again, you still aren't going to send them out to hunt hillbillies, a shotgun is the main defense and the use of shotguns against small drones that are mostly surveillance has been extensive in ukraine so far, and this shit with iran... lol... a large proportion of the drones being used by russia are made in iran. i don't know how advanced israeli drone tech is but after all the shock and awe of recent days of barrages of rockets and jets firing rockets it's going to be the same thing, swarms of surveillance drones, suicide drones, the total failure of old school manouver tactics of warfare. whoever between israel and iran has the best drone tech and drone tactics will do the most damage to the other, and i strongly suspect that will be the iranians.

also, the whole story about nuclear weapons, coming back to the initial topic of this little tome... haha. it's a cover story for something else. if you want to pretend that some smaller country needs to be invaded, it has to have WMDs is the theme of the last 30 years of wars. syria had chemical weapons, and the west staged fake chemical attack videos, i mean... you literally can't trust a fucking thing that you see on video anymore. and i don't think this is new, the whole storyline around nuclear weapons has depended heavily ond scripted and prompted anecdotes, doctored photos and video, all dressed up with doomy music and made to either puff up one side or make the other side look bad... literally all a bunch of special effects and literal conspiracies being used to manipulate people into supporting war.

i don't want any part of war. war is always and only just some kind of sport for psychopathic megolamiacs who sit behind their shell companies and lobbyists to play chess with each other.