📅 Original date posted:2012-12-17
📝 Original message:I've been following this thread closely, and Mike is correct here -
protocol buffers is definitely the way to go.
On 17 December 2012 09:19, Mike Hearn <mike at plan99.net> wrote:
> Can we please drop the binary vs text issue? We have been around it
> millions of times already. There are no compelling arguments to use
> text here and several obvious problems with it. If you think you've
> found a good argument to use JSON, please research protocol buffers
> more thoroughly and see if it changes your mind.
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> LogMeIn Rescue: Anywhere, Anytime Remote support for IT. Free Trial
> Remotely access PCs and mobile devices and provide instant support
> Improve your efficiency, and focus on delivering more value-add services
> Discover what IT Professionals Know. Rescue delivers
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/logmein_12329d2d
> _______________________________________________
> Bitcoin-development mailing list
> Bitcoin-development at lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20121217/ac1042fa/attachment.html>;
Gary Rowe [ARCHIVE] /
npub1j8…wpach
2023-06-07 10:43:09
in reply to nevent1q…pgly
Author Public Key
npub1j8mfekhmgtne6ptzxptudrcpwd6wtyxk64qdn3swy2nv46zuledskwpachPublished at
2023-06-07 10:43:09Event JSON
{
"id": "0ff41be128ade304b21fad75288c1d6f36ce5a7df3e27ccb599ec1424bf34bb6",
"pubkey": "91f69cdafb42e79d05623057c68f017374e590d6d540d9c60e22a6cae85cfe5b",
"created_at": 1686134589,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"1bd78b419247dfb60fa2e8b1cf4983b406411160c7aa6e19780a4034c5da34de",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"ed4ec0493f2820b9da58c10a352c81e6b61c301f252b220a7811d3a34b5d905c",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"f2c95df3766562e3b96b79a0254881c59e8639f23987846961cf55412a77f6f2"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2012-12-17\n📝 Original message:I've been following this thread closely, and Mike is correct here -\nprotocol buffers is definitely the way to go.\n\n\nOn 17 December 2012 09:19, Mike Hearn \u003cmike at plan99.net\u003e wrote:\n\n\u003e Can we please drop the binary vs text issue? We have been around it\n\u003e millions of times already. There are no compelling arguments to use\n\u003e text here and several obvious problems with it. If you think you've\n\u003e found a good argument to use JSON, please research protocol buffers\n\u003e more thoroughly and see if it changes your mind.\n\u003e\n\u003e\n\u003e ------------------------------------------------------------------------------\n\u003e LogMeIn Rescue: Anywhere, Anytime Remote support for IT. Free Trial\n\u003e Remotely access PCs and mobile devices and provide instant support\n\u003e Improve your efficiency, and focus on delivering more value-add services\n\u003e Discover what IT Professionals Know. Rescue delivers\n\u003e http://p.sf.net/sfu/logmein_12329d2d\n\u003e _______________________________________________\n\u003e Bitcoin-development mailing list\n\u003e Bitcoin-development at lists.sourceforge.net\n\u003e https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development\n\u003e\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20121217/ac1042fa/attachment.html\u003e",
"sig": "148a685502995ba6d09ff39e53cd6a77baf6b694063c179d5dfd752eced7c7b2bcbc06f502d7f1a43a7bfa39885e072f19c341bb4768a557671fa90a04d1f0a5"
}