📅 Original date posted:2015-08-14
📝 Original message:I extremely dislike the inversion to preserve the "previous nSequence
semantics". The "previous nSequence semantics" were
consensus-unenforceable but we can cover the same use cases (or the
realistic ones at least) with nMaturity. Let's face it and move on
without technical debt we don't need and may regret. If we do this
inversion we will likely carry it for very long if not forever.
As a side effect, I believe documentation can become much clearer
(maybe even shorter simultaneusly).
Jorge Timón [ARCHIVE] /
npub1fx…cl2d8
2023-06-07 17:34:56
in reply to nevent1q…s4a8
Author Public Key
npub1fx98zxt3lzspjs5f4msr0fxysx5euucm29ghysryju7vpc9j0jzqtcl2d8Published at
2023-06-07 17:34:56Event JSON
{
"id": "0fd58ff4d18cb121ce1ca65b307e356583014d46a0da69d3a6bbd44c59059035",
"pubkey": "498a711971f8a0194289aee037a4c481a99e731b5151724064973cc0e0b27c84",
"created_at": 1686159296,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"41b744fb00dece0ad755afb2bd169d7e5d2189a91240037a08b3b215596a998e",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"ee3f6b4ff5f73e4ea2337543857adf1fe7ac7d12f23f24a09511728f28c4e04f",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"1c61d995949cbfaf14f767784e166bde865c7b8783d7aa3bf0a1d014b70c0069"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2015-08-14\n📝 Original message:I extremely dislike the inversion to preserve the \"previous nSequence\nsemantics\". The \"previous nSequence semantics\" were\nconsensus-unenforceable but we can cover the same use cases (or the\nrealistic ones at least) with nMaturity. Let's face it and move on\nwithout technical debt we don't need and may regret. If we do this\ninversion we will likely carry it for very long if not forever.\nAs a side effect, I believe documentation can become much clearer\n(maybe even shorter simultaneusly).",
"sig": "00bddb9965a7acd300c502fc7eb424648aa959a18248b5442c53d9dc7085e7d080b3f2a1d1936bf8a77569dde5cbc69fdda2e93aedfebfc21260f7cfa6814e47"
}