ð
Original date posted:2016-05-11
ð Original message:On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 6:43 PM, Sergio Demian Lerner <
sergio.d.lerner at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> You can find it here:
> https://bitslog.wordpress.com/2014/03/18/the-re-design-of-the-bitcoin-block-header/
>
> Basically, the idea is to put in the first 64 bytes a 4 byte hash of the
> second 64-byte chunk. That design also allows increased nonce space in the
> first 64 bytes.
>
> My mistake here. I didn't recalled correctly my own idea. The idea is to
include in the second 64-byte chunk a 4-byte hash of the first chunk, not
the opposite.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20160511/b0e9c92b/attachment.html>;
Sergio Demian Lerner [ARCHIVE] /
npub1fvâŠ3vq7f
2023-06-07 17:50:30
in reply to nevent1qâŠc8fd
Author Public Key
npub1fvuxqdqg7klqqgy3yy8gdxjv4phu92sll5y8zqm2qe5qdrhxymhqf3vq7fPublished at
2023-06-07 17:50:30Event JSON
{
"id": "0b0da09200e72f555909a533dc1996a84b18bd81d67392da2bc5677403c0603b",
"pubkey": "4b38603408f5be002091210e869a4ca86fc2aa1ffd0871036a0668068ee626ee",
"created_at": 1686160230,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"b74d6e3e945ee090c612026984f249efe6d61ca521fddbb0329fa69f81265a0b",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"281ccf0afc50e6b87f6e6f760b272cc59cce4c36f17da485f3f3446290499b6b",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"cd753aa8fbc112e14ffe9fe09d3630f0eff76ca68e376e004b8e77b687adddba"
]
],
"content": "ð
Original date posted:2016-05-11\nð Original message:On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 6:43 PM, Sergio Demian Lerner \u003c\nsergio.d.lerner at gmail.com\u003e wrote:\n\n\u003e\n\u003e\n\u003e You can find it here:\n\u003e https://bitslog.wordpress.com/2014/03/18/the-re-design-of-the-bitcoin-block-header/\n\u003e\n\u003e Basically, the idea is to put in the first 64 bytes a 4 byte hash of the\n\u003e second 64-byte chunk. That design also allows increased nonce space in the\n\u003e first 64 bytes.\n\u003e\n\u003e My mistake here. I didn't recalled correctly my own idea. The idea is to\ninclude in the second 64-byte chunk a 4-byte hash of the first chunk, not\nthe opposite.\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20160511/b0e9c92b/attachment.html\u003e",
"sig": "470ff29999da17e447bd7551ad971f329df3faf56cdc61625de3528da7dcecd092caba0d8dc710a87a1f812b6a630136f450fd27922c6128ac527954a4765dd9"
}