đź“… Original date posted:2021-12-06
đź“ť Original message:Hi,
I'm not a bitcoin developer.
On Mon, Dec 6, 2021, 5:05 AM Héctor José Cárdenas Pacheco via bitcoin-dev <
bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I’ve been thinking about how OP_RETURN is being used to create and trade
> NFTs on Bitcoin (think RarePepes, SoG and other new ones) and was wondering
> if it’s possible to
>
Do you have a link to any of these protocols?
make transactions with this opcode via Lightning.
>
> More specific questions could be:
>
> 1. Can opcodes like OP_RETURN be inside a channel’s opening or closing
> transaction?
> 2. If so, could that OP_RETURN change hands within that channel or
> network of channels?
>
> OP_RETURNs do not have ownership according to the bitcoin network. It is
not hard to define a protocol that associates an OP_RETURN with ownership,
and ownership could then be transferred via lightning by sending associated
currency via lightning. Robustness improvements seem possible.
> 1. If possible, could the OP_RETURN be divisible? Could one person
> send a piece of a OP_RETURN just like one can do right now on the primary
> ledger or would it need to maintain the OP_RETURN code intact?
>
> OP_RETURNs themselves do not have ownership, but you can define a protocol
that gives them divisible ownership, including via lightning.
I’m assuming that, if possible, this would need a protocol layer parallel
> to Bitcoin/Lightning that stores and reads all Bitcoin transactions and the
> ones which involve the node's channels as well as the ones with the
> OP_RETURN, just like CounterParty does right now with the primary ledger.
>
> Thank in advance.
> ——
>
> *Héctor Cárdenas*@hcarpach
>
> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20211206/f3253ec4/attachment.html>;
Karl [ARCHIVE] /
npub10h…9xjf9
2023-06-07 23:00:50
in reply to nevent1q…sk24
Author Public Key
npub10hvdghlzknsxl8n9fhevm3hc6ppgkmnhjl0x7999hylnmcm3jursv9xjf9Published at
2023-06-07 23:00:50Event JSON
{
"id": "09607c1195af923be182adcb882934abe5b871503b5278aa548418c71ba956ea",
"pubkey": "7dd8d45fe2b4e06f9e654df2cdc6f8d0428b6e7797de6f14a5b93f3de3719707",
"created_at": 1686178850,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"3992f0f4d06287b631d846008de2f621ef20147059863a3439429e50510242eb",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"1910163109805b6748180e76cca18e0f1e04b2489bd243e4692ee5ac0060b07c",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"e6c14b1c9c3c1e991498d6e031e94d02e1b824fa4e2ff682c91d78cb20e72edf"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2021-12-06\n📝 Original message:Hi,\n\nI'm not a bitcoin developer.\n\nOn Mon, Dec 6, 2021, 5:05 AM Héctor José Cárdenas Pacheco via bitcoin-dev \u003c\nbitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\u003e wrote:\n\n\u003e Hello all,\n\u003e\n\u003e I’ve been thinking about how OP_RETURN is being used to create and trade\n\u003e NFTs on Bitcoin (think RarePepes, SoG and other new ones) and was wondering\n\u003e if it’s possible to\n\u003e\n\nDo you have a link to any of these protocols?\n\nmake transactions with this opcode via Lightning.\n\u003e\n\u003e More specific questions could be:\n\u003e\n\u003e 1. Can opcodes like OP_RETURN be inside a channel’s opening or closing\n\u003e transaction?\n\u003e 2. If so, could that OP_RETURN change hands within that channel or\n\u003e network of channels?\n\u003e\n\u003e OP_RETURNs do not have ownership according to the bitcoin network. It is\nnot hard to define a protocol that associates an OP_RETURN with ownership,\nand ownership could then be transferred via lightning by sending associated\ncurrency via lightning. Robustness improvements seem possible.\n\n\n\u003e 1. If possible, could the OP_RETURN be divisible? Could one person\n\u003e send a piece of a OP_RETURN just like one can do right now on the primary\n\u003e ledger or would it need to maintain the OP_RETURN code intact?\n\u003e\n\u003e OP_RETURNs themselves do not have ownership, but you can define a protocol\nthat gives them divisible ownership, including via lightning.\n\nI’m assuming that, if possible, this would need a protocol layer parallel\n\u003e to Bitcoin/Lightning that stores and reads all Bitcoin transactions and the\n\u003e ones which involve the node's channels as well as the ones with the\n\u003e OP_RETURN, just like CounterParty does right now with the primary ledger.\n\u003e\n\u003e Thank in advance.\n\u003e ——\n\u003e\n\u003e *Héctor Cárdenas*@hcarpach\n\u003e\n\u003e _______________________________________________\n\u003e bitcoin-dev mailing list\n\u003e bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org\n\u003e https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev\n\u003e\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20211206/f3253ec4/attachment.html\u003e",
"sig": "18cc82195e7e3087b460c979606808e585e024fad9967eec29718d0e36f850fafd970941e20f9f6be826c4eef1f3b1ce4c2020faedbf26f5411935ffd055393e"
}