cyberpunk on Nostr: So that there would not be a central entity that decided what is a "monetary" ...

So that there would not be a central entity that decided what is a "monetary" transaction and what is not, protocol rules of consent were created, if you really believe that having a central entity that decides what is a "monetary" transaction and what is not, according to what it seems to him, I will tell you that machine, knots and company represent the beginning of a narrative to centralize the decision of which transaction seems good to me and No, protocol rules have already been created, the transaction complies with the rules = the transaction enters, and a fee is also charged in the scarcest currency on the planet, in bitcoin, so bitcoin is antispam, if you keep listening to machine you will end up in a fork of shitcoinknots because they are simply authoritarian, spam cannot be stopped because reversible steganography allows you to always enter jpgs or whatever you want to any In a hidden and intelligent way, the fee is enough filter for the use of the timechain.