📅 Original date posted:2015-07-20
📝 Original message:>
> In my previous post, I was suggesting to *not* include the proof in the
> request, because the payer can download it independently. Only the final
> signature is needed. What makes DNSSEC interesting is not the size of
> the proof, but rather the fact that you can request it easily, and in a
> canonical way.
>
Yes, but you still need the final signature. Is it possible to use an EC
signature with DNSSEC? I thought it was an all-RSA system. If I'm wrong
about that, and all you need is 32 bytes, then my argument does not hold.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150720/7c3a721f/attachment.html>;
Mike Hearn [ARCHIVE] /
npub17t…4qgyd
2023-06-07 15:42:08
in reply to nevent1q…yafe
Author Public Key
npub17ty4mumkv43w8wtt0xsz2jypck0gvw0j8xrcg6tpea25z2nh7meqf4qgydPublished at
2023-06-07 15:42:08Event JSON
{
"id": "0cb11d91c737b3e88d13470d5fe8400bc79591cc5c3bbcd69c629336f0b78e3b",
"pubkey": "f2c95df3766562e3b96b79a0254881c59e8639f23987846961cf55412a77f6f2",
"created_at": 1686152528,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"2b792280c7c77e1a9146c50dbbc2a8f3336e57397d73b26f225d7fe35c48cd85",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"b80c84ff1054716469c2d53037632ed222f4cd95f8eb0c91e828cf2a926ef363",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"7a4ba40070e54012212867182c66beef592603fe7c7284b72ffaafce9da20c05"
]
],
"content": "📅 Original date posted:2015-07-20\n📝 Original message:\u003e\n\u003e In my previous post, I was suggesting to *not* include the proof in the\n\u003e request, because the payer can download it independently. Only the final\n\u003e signature is needed. What makes DNSSEC interesting is not the size of\n\u003e the proof, but rather the fact that you can request it easily, and in a\n\u003e canonical way.\n\u003e\n\nYes, but you still need the final signature. Is it possible to use an EC\nsignature with DNSSEC? I thought it was an all-RSA system. If I'm wrong\nabout that, and all you need is 32 bytes, then my argument does not hold.\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150720/7c3a721f/attachment.html\u003e",
"sig": "451d24d0a5ef5d6592adc05cea826977cfd10ab9570fa78f69dc6910f6788545d06ea26450df8249f8562a6c60881003ab53199dc646e8c7e1b4ff287ff57018"
}