Event JSON
{
"id": "0c31dc473d24b1fcbba198e7a05549553bed9fa8a0c21c03eafeca0068d6d687",
"pubkey": "9d3345095e986ded9af724d26a8c5bee050bfd615c32fc5e76981a089c72008e",
"created_at": 1737728697,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"r",
"https://www.theguardian.com/law/2025/jan/24/judges-presided-sara-sharif-hearings-can-be-named-appeal"
],
[
"subject",
"Judges who presided over Sara Sharif hearings to be named after appeal"
],
[
"published_at",
"1737725988"
],
[
"image",
"https://i.guim.co.uk/img/media/de4ddf17320af978234630ea4a86835e307782b6/0_409_4252_2552/master/4252.jpg?width=140\u0026quality=85\u0026auto=format\u0026fit=max\u0026s=e41d500da0e6751c995eb47690e38357"
],
[
"p",
"9d3345095e986ded9af724d26a8c5bee050bfd615c32fc5e76981a089c72008e",
"wss://relay-testnet.k8s.layer3.news"
],
[
"imeta",
"url https://i.guim.co.uk/img/media/de4ddf17320af978234630ea4a86835e307782b6/0_409_4252_2552/master/4252.jpg?width=140\u0026quality=85\u0026auto=format\u0026fit=max\u0026s=e41d500da0e6751c995eb47690e38357"
],
[
"t",
"liberal:perspective"
],
[
"summary",
"The court ruled that the initial ban was unjustified and that the judges' names could be revealed, allowing for greater transparency and accountability in the justice system. The judges had previously been anonymized due to concerns about their safety, but the Court of Appeal found that the ban was not justified and that the judges' identities could be revealed without posing a risk to their safety."
]
],
"content": "nostr:nprofile1qy3hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtt5v4ehgmn9wshxkwrn9ekxz7t9wgejumn9waesqgyaxdzsjh5cdhke4aey6f4gcklwq59l6c2uxt79ua5crgyfcusq3cwyf5fq\nhttps://i.guim.co.uk/img/media/de4ddf17320af978234630ea4a86835e307782b6/0_409_4252_2552/master/4252.jpg?width=140\u0026quality=85\u0026auto=format\u0026fit=max\u0026s=e41d500da0e6751c995eb47690e38357\nRuling says Mr Justice Williams got ‘carried away’ when he banned naming of judges involved in schoolgirl’s care casesThree judges who oversaw family court proceedings related to the care of Sara Sharif can be named next week, the court of appeal has ruled.Mr Justice Williams said in December that the media could not name the judges who oversaw family court proceedings relating to the 10-year-old schoolgirl over concerns of a “real risk” of harm to them from a “virtual lynch mob”. Continue reading...\nhttps://www.theguardian.com/law/2025/jan/24/judges-presided-sara-sharif-hearings-can-be-named-appeal",
"sig": "f1c0870b85118f60e1e009585be0d4c1afe1aa202bd502e8227d0df6991cae4bd3fc15ca33a5e151df36f8fc593e472c94faf19e0f550fce524cab707bc2e43f"
}
